It may be good to focus on non track roads to support hotosm.

Thanks
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138978770

The road geometry can not be validated using Bing imagery, as there exists a building where the road is traced as bent in your edit.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138978770

Please use full name instead of place names. I have updated it as Chilakaluripeta Substation. Please update if you have actual name.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138971224

From Bing imagery, this is more like a residential road rather than service road.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138791993

Using Bing imagery, the road appears more like a track to go to fields. Tagging it as service road may not be correct.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138791843

The hotel node is too close to the road. Hope it is correct. If you have local knowledge, it is better to place it at the center of its building
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138933911

Please focus on the warnings that you see when you upload data and try to fix the same before final upload. For example addr:housenumber addr:street are needed. addr:housenumber has a name rather than house number. addr:street is not added.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138944300

Nice to see you are cleaning up lot of warnings, Please upload in smaller area level like that of a district for your changsets for facilitating easier review.

It may be better to concentrate on adding features from the gpx traces that you have, rather than add village track roads

Please add source for the name like website etc
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138918477

This seems to be more like an alley (narrow street) rather than residential from Bing imagery and the end segment does not looklike a road at all. Unless you have clear evidence of ground truth like gps track, it is advisable not to map these just based on imagery.

Whatever is in Blue is not water. Unless you have clear evidence of water, do not map
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138807323

District name should not be mentioned. Reverted your changset and cleaned up tags via changeset 138921708
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138873990

Please add villages as a node, rather than the name of the area. I have done it as osm.org/changeset/138847532
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138717159

It is difficult to locate towers from bing aerial imagery. What is the source for your edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138801301

The focus of mapping is on roads. It may be better to just focus on that and not add buildings.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138824567

Please provide detailed explanation of what you did in your changset for more effective feedback.

The waterway didnot appear to be a culvert to me from Bing Maps Aerial. If you have local knowledge of ground truth, it is fine.

Welcometo OSM. Your changeset looks good. Please add information if you have about the location of towers as well.