OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
139328627 almost 2 years ago

Please update changesets covering a small area when you are begining to work with OSM to facilitate review by others. Try to eliminate warnings as much as possible.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139328627

139263092 almost 2 years ago

Do not add private information like person name for features. all tags are not relevant. just buiding related tags should be used. check osm.wiki/Buildings for more info
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139263092

139326406 almost 2 years ago

osm.org/node/11082369493 street cabinet should be close to the street, but his appears to be far.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139326406

139333386 almost 2 years ago

Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (osm.wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia) Regarding this changeset, I noted that highway node is joined to an administrative boundary. I have removed it via osm.org/changeset/139335609#map=16/17.3448/78.4933
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139333386

139333548 almost 2 years ago

Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (osm.wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia)
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139333548

139327699 almost 2 years ago

Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (osm.wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia) Regarding this change set, name of the road should be simple names like Road No 2, and not Sambamurthy Nagar Road No 2, as the locality of the road is apparent from the marking of boundary of Sambamurthy Nagar on the map.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139327699

139218632 almost 2 years ago

Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (osm.wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Please use building=apartment and not tourism.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139218632

139231251 almost 2 years ago

You can use Point feature and add tags

139231251 almost 2 years ago

In OSM, it is better to make use of changeset discussions, to facilitate collaboration among the wider community, rather than private email messages. Hence I took the liberty to quote
your email response to provide my response. Hope you do not mind. I quote "I got this email from you copied below:

Did see a simple way I could respond directly back.

The location I tried to identify as an apartment is on the map an unamed village/hamlet/enclave. I happen to know the residents very well for the past ten years. The place is called MGR Nagar. I did not see a category in the list called village. So what can I call it? Curtis Degler"

My response is as follows. You can use the tag called place=village with name=MGR Nagar and population= xxx.

139220106 almost 2 years ago

The name tag should reflect the name on the name board if any, otherwise it should be left blank. I have also fixed the track to the nearest valid road segment as per bing imagery wide osm.org/changeset/139258799
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139220106

139231251 almost 2 years ago

Bing imagery does not show evidence of an apartment. If you have local knowledge, it is fine. If it is residential apartment building do not use tourism tag. Use building tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139231251

139201402 almost 2 years ago

It is better not to map track roads to fields. Do not duplicate road segments.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139201402

139201402 almost 2 years ago

It is better not to map track roads to fields. Do not duplicate road segments.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139201402

139170594 almost 2 years ago

Most of these that you mapped are track roads to fields. It is better to focus on roads near residential areas.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139170594

139147533 almost 2 years ago

Please provide detailed changeset comments for facilitating review
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139147533

139147533 almost 2 years ago

osm.org/way/1193003317 can not be identified from bing imagery. This is part of landuse industrial already. Unless you know the area and name of the plot owner, it is better not to map such things.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139147533

138744080 almost 2 years ago

This segment osm.org/way/1190746843 does not match with Bing image. The joining point appears to be not correct. If you do not have actual gps traces, please do not map.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138744080

138704216 almost 2 years ago

Good attempt to map building. Bing shows that it is still in construction, as shown by traces of crane.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138704216

139075381 almost 2 years ago

Please provide detailed changset comments like "added buildings and features in <place name>"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139075381

139075381 almost 2 years ago

I have updated tags for some of your edits via osm.org/changeset/139205965
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139075381