Welcome. Landuse need not be contained in administrative boundaries. for example for osm.org/way/738364011#map=18/10.94956/76.09477 could spread even to neighboring administrative areas.

Welcome to OSM. Hope you find osm.wiki helpful for you.

Thanks. As you have been editing several Andhra Pradesh districts, do you see any major errors with Prakasam district (which shares borders with Guntur, Nellore, Kurnool districts) boundary, as it was formed in 1970's. Your answer will help me to know the extent of errors in AP district shapes and might be helpful in taking up corrections.

Thanks Heinz_V for your response. Can you share the steps you are following for updating from Bharatmaps. Are you getting digital data directly from Bharatmaps?

For more information check osm.wiki/Talk:Districts_in_Andhra_Pradesh second section.

https://osmhistory.appspot.com/relation/10153489/6 version is correct, as it is based on revenue village boundaries. You have corrected the shape to align with old district border. Can you explain your reasoning.

http://www.apwrims.ap.gov.in/lischemeHomePage/SRI%20VENKATESWARA%20L%20I%20SCHEME

Got to know about the /dirty suffix for url to refresh the tiles. Now it is working. Thanks

I tried in private tab, there is no difference. I tried to see in landuse focussed webmap provider. They also do not seem to be updating frequently. While the features are removed from database, we do not seem to have a way of getting the latest updated map for land use.

It has been 12 days. When will the change reflect in OSM standard maps? Is there anyway to speed it up?

@planemad

I have fixed other places in India as well

Sorry, it was actually Telugu sign for Zero instead of Telugu Anuswara. I have fixed using osm.wiki/Level0 editor for Andhra Pradesh

Noticed use of English O inplaceof Telugu Sunna in several telugu names updated by you. Example Addanki in this changeset. I have corrected this. Can you correct your updates and avoid this issue for future updates.

Thanks for your response, I will clean up if any left over in Prakasam district

As per http://apenvis.nic.in/wetland.html there are no wetlands in Prakasam district. Hence this needs to be deleted. Actually, there exists villages and dry land used for farming.

I have not used Bhuvan so far. Thanks for response on this issue. Hope you will do what is necessary to eliminate validation errors.

To add to my previous comment, I realize that you have given Bing as the source information, but Bing imagery will not give the administrative boundaries as per my knowledge.

Thanks for your response. The administrative boundaries need to be regions with closed boundaries. It is not clear what is the source information for this changeset. Hope you can fix the validation errors.

I was validating Telangana boundary and found errors Unclosed way boundary type administrative with elements from this change set. As there were no commit comments, I wanted to check whether the errors can be fixed by mostly deleting.