Hi,
In this edit you changed oneway=no to oneway=yes. This was an incorrect change as there are no one-way signs and the road is not designed like a one-way. Also, it was already tagged as oneway=no. Also, in changeset 99430216 you also added oneway=yes incorrectly at an intersection. Please be sure to verify with street-level imagery before adding oneway=yes at intersections like these.

Hi,
What was your reasoning for deleting the driveway on Taft Street in this edit? Driveways are included in OpenStreetMap.

Hi,
I've noticed that you have been changing a lot of highway=unclassified roads to highway=residential in Nashua. What's your reasoning behind that? These aren't local roads in residential areas.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I reviewed your edit and fixed your mistakes. I recommend reading more from the Wiki so that you can improve your mapping. Specifically osm.wiki/Key:highway#Roads and osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark.
Thank you for your contributions

Hi,
In OpenStreetMap, we try to map things as they exist in real life, not as they appear on other maps. The streams in the Pine Valley area are all intermittent. There is evidence for it in the various imagery layers, and I have been there myself and seen them dry.

Hi,
Please notice that there are already bus_bay tags on 100 South. Because there is no physical separation, the bus bay cannot be mapped as a separate way.

Hi,
I undid this edit for two reasons. First, the streetlevel imagery shows that there are stop signs on both branches of Woodbury Road, and therefore there is no one-way restriction. Second, there are many intersections like this where a high-traffic road meets a low-traffic road at a weird angle, so there are branches so that no one has to make too sharp of a turn. I have noticed Amazon Logistics mappers misidentifying many of these intersections as having one-ways. I would ask that it be added to your SOP to check the street-level imagery for intersections like this.
Thanks

Hello,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for your edits. The religious landuse tag is meant for the area immediately around churches, so, if you wanted to, you could add it around the churches, their parking lots, and parks. I changed the area you added for this ward to a religious administrative boundary.
Happy mapping!

Simply because OSM is a volunteer effort no one has gotten around to it yet. Feel free to start adding them :)

Hello,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see in this edit you removed a building. Please notice that OpenStreetMap, like many other geographic datasets, included buildings. Please see osm.wiki/Buildings for more information. If this building was destroyed in the last few months, I recommend tagging it as `demolished:building=yes` to indicate that.

Hi,
I reverted this changeset because you deleted a perfectly valid road that was drawn by a local mapper. Please refrain from deleting roads that exist on the ground from OpenStreetMap.

Hi,
I'm confused by this edit. Did the asphalt for these roads get torn up in the last few months? I haven't been to Cedar City since the summertime, so I might have missed something.

Hi,
I reviewed this edit, and I am just commenting to clear up the confusion about relations. When you added the subdivision to the Wellsville relation with the role `inner`, that's saying that the subdivision is _not_ part of Wellsville. So the correct thing to do is to not have the subdivision in the Wellsville relation at all. Data consumers can tell that it is part of Wellsville because it is within the geographic bounds of the city. By analogy, you can look at the boundary line for Wellsville itself. It's not an `inner` member of the Cache County relation, and data consumers can tell that Wellsville is in Cache County from the coordinates of the nodes. I went ahead and fixed the mistake.

Thank you for your contributions!

Hello,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for you contribution near Woodbury. I fixed the mistake in Bedford, NH. Happy mapping!

Hello,
I see that you are tagging the grassy curbs in the parking lot of the Atkinson Country Club as golf fairways and many footpaths as service roads. This is incorrect tagging. Please see osm.wiki/Tag:golf%3Dfairway for more information on what a fairway is, and osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice for more information on what a service road is.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap!
What did you mean by saying "this trail needs to be deleted"? Lots of people used it this past year. Is the land being clear-cut this winter?

Hi,
As I reminded you before, in OpenStreetMap, abbreviations like Rd are saved to Road. Please see osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29 for more information.

Hello,
Just so you know, OSM naming guidelines are to avoid abbreviations on roadways whenever possible. This means the abbreviated "Rd" ought to be "Road". Please see osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29 for more information.

Ah, a road that has been closed subject to gates and bars is a Class VI road and therefore a public right of way (the gates and bars are legally prohibited from being locked). Also, the access to the house should be mapped. Thank you for confirming the status of this road.

Hi,
I have concerns about this edit where you deleted Old Mason Road. In the imagery from 2019, there is a house there. And documents from the Town of Greenfield list it as a Class VI road as recently as 2018. I can't find any evidence that it was discontinued and destroyed in the last two years. What is your source?