Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions. I reviewed your edit, as you requested. Just so you know, the sidewalk tag is only for footways that on the sides of roads, not for footways that are on the interior of properties. Also, you added a lot of entrances to this school. You might be interested in tagging one of them as a main entrance. I'm guessing that it's the one on the east side by the walkway to the high school, but I don't know for sure. Happy mapping!

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edits, as you requested, and I think that they're good for the most part. I did remove two residential areas that you added because the neighborhood by this school already has a residential area on it. You might be interested in osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dschoolyard which has a nice schematic for tagging schoolyards. Happy mapping!

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edits by Wayne High, as you requested, and I think that they're good for the most part. Just so you know, there's a way to make buildings you edit have nice, neat right angles like they do in real life. If you select a feature and press the "q" button on the keyboard, it will make the angles into right angles for you. Happy mapping!

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your two edits in Marysvale, as you requested, and I think that they are both good. Happy mapping!

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions. I reviewed your edit, as you requested, and I think that it's mostly fine. However, you removed a section of road at the intersection of Clawson Place and 5th East and placed a gate right on 5th East. This bit was incorrect, and I removed the gate and fixed the alignment of Clawson Place. Also, the bit of Bueno Avenue by the Ronald McDonald House should be service, not residential, because there aren't any residences down it. Please see osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice for more information on what qualifies as a service road.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edits, as you requested, and I think they're good :)

Thanks! I just finished it, corrected the mistakes, and checked it off on the Wiki. I was so excited to see a USBR go straight through the Wasatch Front, I just had to add it! If I have time tomorrow, I'll get started on the spur routes :)

Hi,
I see that you added a whole bunch of streets with the key "ref" set to the street's location on the grid system (i.e., "ref=North 3485 East"). This role should actually be fulfilled by the alt_name key. The ref key on highways is for numbered routes, like UT 68, US 89, or I 15.

Hi,
This is a duplicate of osm.org/node/5711549621, which is a few miles to the east.

Hi,
I've been seeing you add landcover here in the Fishlake area as it comes across one of my RSS feeds, and I just want to say thank you for all of your contributions in this area! It's some great stuff!

To your point "So if your intent is to make a correction, go ahead and log in and make it. It's not that hard." I already did that once in changeset 102808433 without informing you, assuming that you had made a simple mistake. Then you went back in and changed the surface back to dirt, which showed that you did not think that you made a mistake. Since you did not think that you had made mistake, my request for a source was totally appropriate. Your return to this segment was much faster than with our other edit wars, so it seemed like you may have had some reason for it. Perhaps I should have left the explanation for why I wanted a source for message 3, and simply said "source plz" as the first comment on this changeset. I'll keep that in mind for the future.

Hi,
I am extremely confused by your efforts to classify parts of Loveren's Mill Road as dirt. I haven't driven over there, but I find it _extremely_ hard to believe that Antrim tore up an asphalt road and then replaced it with a soft dirt surface. It sounds like a completely unnecessary expense for the town; it'd be cheaper to let it crumble to dust. Also, dirt roads are extraordinarily rare in New Hampshire, especially south of the mountains. The vast, vast majority of maintained, unpaved highways are either compacted or fine gravel. Can you show me some evidence that Loveren's Mill Road has been completely resurfaced in this way, either the call for bids or discussions held in town meetings. Surely such an expense would have been extremely controversial, but I cannot find evidence for it on the town website myself.

Hi,
It's 100% OK to just delete features that no longer exist, especially something removed a half-century ago. If there are ruins or other remnants that you think might be useful for wayfinding, then you could remove the amenity=shelter tag and add a building=ruins tag.

It looks like the 21st South Freeway bore the `name` "2100 South Freeway" for the whole length before user Sagei redid the entire thing last month in 100563396. Also it looks like they changed it from motorway to trunk? That edit didn't come across my radar when it happened, but, reviewing it now, it looks like a whole bunch of bad things. They deleted the history for the entire freeway, removed the real name and replaced it with the fakery you just removed, misapplied link tags, and changed it to trunk for no reason. It looks like TheConductor started fixing it up in 100872686.

Thanks for the feedback! I did some research and found that 200 N Fairgrounds Road is where they perform outpatient surgeries, so I added it as a clinic node with Castleview Hospital as the operator in osm.org/changeset/102821951. I also learned more about how OSM tags healthcare centers, so I changed the urology-specialized "hospital" that user darognar3 created in the new buildings to a clinic node as well.

Hi,
Thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edit, as you requested, and I think it's mostly good. One mistake I found was that you added some building tags in weird places (like on the gas station relation), but those were a quick fix.
Happy mapping!

Hi,
Thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your 3 edits, as you requested, and I think they're good. I did change the Gosling Meadows neighborhood point that you added to an apartment complex area. The neighborhood tag is meant for more organic neighborhoods like "South End". You can read osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential#Named_residential_areas for more information.

Hi,
In this edit, you deleted a whole bunch of perfectly valid ways, only to redraw some of them. This behavior is not appropriate as it deletes the history. Please see osm.wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history for more information.

Hi,
The USGS topos are incorrect in this case, as they are often. The USGS maps are very old, although I don't think they were every correct in this location since they think the road went over rocks, and I don't see any traces of an old road besides the road bed that's currently visible.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I'm reviewing your edit, as you requested, but I'm not quite sure about it yet. Was this intersection reconstructed last summer? I didn't notice any disruption when I drove by a few weeks ago, but I could have missed it. As it was when the last aerial and street-level imagery was taken, Scribner and Huckins Roads don't meet the Parker Mountain Road at the same place, but are offset by more than 30 feet.