aweech's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
83218026 | over 5 years ago | Hi,
|
83031087 | over 5 years ago | Hi,
|
81018468 | over 5 years ago | Yeah, I watch to see when Amazon does weird things like "Created Unmaintained Track Road" and fix those situations. |
71154522 | over 5 years ago | Cool, I'm sure you pinged every Nampa mapper since all those weird layer tags were introduced a very long time ago, but I went through and checked your work. I agreed with most of it and made a few improvements. Happy mapping! |
81890077 | over 5 years ago | Hi,
|
81833602 | over 5 years ago | Hi, you deleted this street and Hurley Street nearby, claiming that they do not exist. They very clearly do exist in the imagery and on public documents. I went ahead and reverted these changes. I'll change Hurley Street to a driveway though since there's only one building on it. |
81541414 | over 5 years ago | Hi,
|
81436854 | over 5 years ago | Hi,
|
81186543 | over 5 years ago | As it does us all! Again, sorry about the grief at the top. Thinking too much about having to plow the snow tonight and not enough about being polite and clear in my speech, haha. |
81186543 | over 5 years ago | Yeah, Oak Hill Road in Northfield is 35 mph, not 30. It changes speed limits at the town line. You can see the sign on the streetside imagery too. I'll check out that program! |
81186543 | over 5 years ago | Ah, I've thought about trying to get speed limit data out of GPS traces. What software do you use for it if I might ask? I'll go ahead and fix the roads I surveyed recently. |
81186543 | over 5 years ago | I'm sorry, that was rude of me to say your source was wrong. What I meant was that I am puzzled at the discrepancies between my survey and your source. |
81186543 | over 5 years ago | Hi,
|
81186326 | over 5 years ago | Hi,
|
80768742 | over 5 years ago | Hi, what's your source for adding `access=private` to this way? You listed streetlevel imagery, but none of the publicly available ones that I could find have images for this area. |
79072293 | over 5 years ago | Hi, you changed this cycleway into a footway. What was your source for this change? Last I checked pedestrians were still banned here, and it is for bicycles only. |
78824162 | over 5 years ago | Hi, you marked this street with `access=no`. That is normally inappropriate for a street with houses on it. If it is a gated community, `access=private` is good. If no through-traffic is allowed, use `access=destination`. |
71121092 | over 5 years ago | I'm a bit of a completionist when it comes to water features; I like to see where water comes from and where it goes as much as possible. But I wouldn't be torn to see the buried SLC portion of this canal gone from the map. |
78544750 | over 5 years ago | Logging roads should be on the map as `highway=path`. If they are not open to the public, then they should also have the tag `access=forestry`. Some of these paths are used by the public. Please replace them. |
78544750 | over 5 years ago | Hi, some of these pathways you deleted are used. Can you please re-add the ones that are used? |