Ah, the relation that I think you're thinking of is tagged with route=railway instead of route=foot;bicycle. I'll go ahead and fix that.

I swung by this area today to see what's up. The roadway has not been destroyed, and in fact it is signed for use by the public. There's a no motor vehicles sign on the north end, and the gate on the south end either has been removed or was swung out of view. So I am restoring the way that you deleted with tags based on what I surveyed. In the future, please only delete ways that do not exist in real life.

Hi,
I'm not sure what you mean by saying that Dearborn Road was never built. It clearly was, and it was discontinued. It's an old road from back when the whole land was cut down for meadows and farms. It was discontinued when there wasn't a traffic need for it anymore, but the old roadway still exists.

In New Hampshire, property owners have a lot of power over these roadways and can bar traffic to others, and, from the Bing streetside imagery, it looks like the landowner on the Stumpfield Road side has put up a gate and uses the roadway to access their fields. A road like that should be tagged as a track road with private access. I didn't see any barriers on the Moulton Ridge Road side, and since it is a popular trail, I'm guessing there aren't any. In New Hampshire, all land is open to the public unless explicitly disallowed via signage or enclosure, though landowners are allowed to shoo individuals away without prior warning.

I'm still hung up on you saying "this road does not exist". Does that mean that the landowner on the Moulton Ridge Road side has clear-cut the entrance? If the roadway still exists, it should be mapped as track road with appropriate access tags (likely permissive).

Hi,
This road was already tagged with private access. Tagging modes with no means that no one is allowed to go down there, not even the landowners and their guests.

Hi,
This road appears in aerial imagery, in streetview imagery, and on the Strava heatmap. What do you mean that there is no road there? Was the forest around it clear-cut over the winter?

Hi,
Why did you delete the route relation for the Concord-Lake Sunapee Trail? It was well-signed when I visited before winter.

Hi,
In the US, we generally don't tag isolated expressways like this as motorway unless they have 3 exits or more. Please see osm.org/changeset/100516766 (which concerns one of your previous edits) and the thread following this https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2021-January/020837.html

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edits, as you requested, and I think that they're good. It looks like a nice place to go for a walk; I'll have to check it out sometime!
Happy Mapping,
aweech

Hi,
A few things about this edit. Firstly, you forgot to expand the abbreviations in the address. Secondly, you forgot to square the building's corners using the "q" keyboard shortcut. The vast majority of buildings, including this one, have corners at right angles. Thirdly, it is helpful to tag the business as an ATV rental place with shop=rental and either rental=atv or rental:atv=yes. Lastly, you said that the address is 99 South Main Street, but you put the building clear out on 300 East. The location data you were using is clearly incorrect. The business is visible in Mapillary imagery on Main Street, where it is expected from the address, so I moved the info over there.

Yes, Bing imagery is out of date, as it very often is. Esri, Mapbox, and Maxar imagery provide more up-to-date imagery.

I retagged it as a tourist attraction, which is somewhat generic but a form of correct. Adding the info to the hotel right there would have worked as well. As would creating a resort node.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edit, as you requested, and I think that it's fine for the most part. There are a few things I'd like to point out though. Firstly, the sidewalk tag is only for paths directly beside a roadway. Secondly, you deleted a service road in the north parking lot, and, when you replaced it, you forgot to connect it to Stallion Way again. It's best practice to not delete things that are correct, but to modify them to make them better. Thirdly, you ignored a lot of warnings about connectivity. 22 in total! The warnings are there for a reason, and should not be ignored. Please connect ways that you create to the overall road network.

Hi,
This is an underground hot spring, not a building.

Hi,
This is literally someone's house, not a hotel. Red Rock Ranch is just across Spanish Valley Drive, and it is a horseback riding facility, not a hotel.

Hi,
The Riverside Inn changed its name to Gateway Inn years ago. Please check for changes like that before changing the names of businesses.

Hi,
You literally drew the hotel over a gas station. This hotel was already in OSM in its correct location. I removed the information you added to the bogus building on this gas station and added it to the real Recapture Lodge.

Hi,
The information for this hotel was already in OSM attached to a different building. I assumed that by duplicating the information, you meant to say that the hotel has more than one building, so I removed the information from both buildings and created a point for it instead. Also, this building is already finished, so it should not be tagged as building=construction.

Hi,
I reviewed your edits, as you requested, and I have some comments about it. Firstly, you left a service road disconnected from the road network. This raised a warning, and it would have been much better to have resolved the warning before uploading the changes (by attaching the service road to 100 East). Also, you partially attached the footway around the back of the school to the building. This also raised warnings, which you could have fixed by not attaching the path and the building.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions. I reviewed your edit, as you requested. It's mostly fine, though there are two things that I want to point out. Firstly, the grassland tag is for natural grassy areas like an abandoned lot. Manicured lawns like at schools is called grass. Also, you added some duplicate information (both a point and an area for the playground and the baseball field).

Happy mapping!

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions. I reviewed your edit, as you requested. The name tag actually doesn't go on any school buildings, but on the school grounds feature, and Wendover High School already has its name. Here is a nice schematic for how the different parts of a school are tagged in OSM: osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool#Campus_details