Hi,
It's not really accurate to apply the tags for The Hampton Inn & Suites entire building as the hotel only occupies a portion of it. There's also restaurants, a parking garage, and a bunch of condos here. All of the other business nodes along the building should have communicated that to you. Also, you moved the building so that it overlaps with the street. You seem to be tracing the roof of the building as it appears in the Bing aerial imagery instead of the base.

Hi,
I have a couple of comments about this edit. For one thing you put the entire address into the addr:city tag for some reason. Only the mailing city goes in that tag. Another is that the Westwind Cottages are much larger than the area that you drew. A business like this with multiple building should be represented either as a node or as an area drawn around the entire campus, not just one corner of it. Also, the area that you drew was had the shape and location of a building, but you didn't tag it as a building for some reason. I've seen Zartico mappers making these mistakes a lot. I think that you need to revise your processes.

Hi,
When a business has multiple buildings like this, it should be modeled as either an area around the entire developed portion of the lot or as a node. Please see osm.wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel#How_to_map for more information.

Hi,
In this edit you clearly copied bad data from Bing Maps. You have already been told before that that is not permissible behavior, and yet you continue.

Hi,
In this edit, you created an object in the place of a building, but you forgot to tag it as a building. I've noticed that you Zartico mappers do that a lot, and I am recommending that you add the building tags where it is appropriate. Also, buildings, including this one, usually have right angles. The editor you are using has two ways to help you draw right angles on buildings. One way is to select the building and press the "q" button. The other is to right click the building and choose the option to square. I see that I reminded you of this back in May, but you seem to have forgotten by now. Please don't forget again.

Hi,
I reviewed this edit as you requested. The old roadbed is faint, and it is not a public highway, so I agree that track isn't the best tag for this. However, I found documents saying that snowmobiles use the roadway, and it did look that way when I visited the site. But I obviously can't be sure if it is used as a snowmobile trail this time of year, so I restored it with the abandoned:highway tag (which doesn't render most places but keeps the data around in case we need to give it standard tags). I'll check again in midwinter to see if there are snowmobile tracks leading into the roadway. Also, in this edit you deleted a rock wall, accidentally I hope, which I restored.

Hi,
I have some comments about this changeset. First, you changed spot B-19 in the Riverside Ranch RV Park back to a tourism=caravan_site. That tag is for the RV Park as a whole, and individual parking spots are tagged as tourism=camp_pitch. Please see osm.wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcaravan_site#Mapping_Facilities_Within_the_Site for more information. Secondly, this changeset spans two very distinct areas, one in the Sevier Valley and one in West Yellowstone. It's best practice to group changes geographically and submit before moving on to another area. Otherwise the changes look good. Thank you for your contributions!

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edit, as you requested, and I think that it is good. I went ahead and fixed the formatting for the opening hours. Happy mapping :)

Hi,
I have some things to point out, and, since this is my fourth time contacting you, I'll keep it short. This property has two separate buildings on it. I know you were able to see this on the Bing imagery you used, and it's even more clear on the other available imagery layers. Also, you created some extra nodes on the northeast building for some reason or accidentally. And you haven't responded to SomeoneElse's question on the thread from the last time I had to contact you about your mapping practices.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions. I have some comments about this changeset and the others you did last night. When you added the bridge on SR 9 in Zion, you didn't leave any of the tags like name or ref. Another thing, you've been deleting a LOT of trails across the state, including some that I have walked myself. Is there a particular reason for doing that?

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I noticed that you were using the tag "atspm:signal_id" to document the ID number of these stoplights in Riverdale. In OpenStreetMap, we use the "ref" key for ID numbers, including those on traffic signals, as documented at osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Traffic_signals_for_cars.

Relations are discouraged for hotels and motels. Please see osm.wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel for more information. There were at least 4 hotel/motels in Utah with more than one building that you missed this morning that I went and fixed. You can tell when a hotel/motel has more than one building based on the shape of the parking lot, the architecture of the buildings, and street level imagery.

This wasn't actually a survey. I meant to type "aerial imagery" but somehow "survey" ended up in there.

Hi,
There are several things about this edit that I would like to point out. Firstly, you abbreviated the directions in the address. In OpenStreetMap, we do not abbreviate these. Secondly, you created an area the size and shape of a building, but you did not tag it as a building. Thirdly, The Blue Mountain Horsehead Inn is more than just this one building. It should either be mapped as a node or as an area encompassing the developed portion of the lot. Lastly, I already brought these points up to you before in osm.org/changeset/107210454 and osm.org/changeset/107210236.

Hi,
In this edit, you abbreviated the directions in the address. These are fully spelled out in OpenStreetMap. Also, many buildings, including this one, have 90° angles at each corner. The editor you were using includes a tool to help make these square angles. You select the building and press the "q" button, or you right click it and select the option to square corners.

Hi,
I reviewed your edit, as you requested. For some reason you deleted the inner edge of Wayne High's track, so I restored that. Also, the entrance tag should be on buildings where there is a door. Thank you for your contributions, and happy mapping!

Hi,
I'm guessing that you aren't aware that we have access to more up-to-date imagery already that shows the driveways that you deleted. In the editor's sidebar on the right, you click the Background Settings button (the one that looks like 3 sheets of paper) to reveal the options. I'm going to go ahead and restore the ones that you deleted and add the rest of the driveways in the neighborhood to match the ones nearby.
Happy mapping!

Hi,
I reverted this edit because it only deleted a driveway. Driveways are mapped in OpenStreetMap. Please see osm.wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway for more information on tagging driveways.

Hi,
I reviewed your edit, as you requested. Why did you decide to limit the beach to that extent? It currently goes out much further than that. The wiki page says that either mapping to the high water line or low water line is fine, though, if we mapped this beach to the high water line, it'd be gone entirely. osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbeach

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions. Just so you know, the park tag is for manicured community open spaces. I retagged the area that you had labeled as the Bridger Estates Grounds as a residential area because a residential development has been put in there over the last decade. Please see osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark for more information.