OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
111671948 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edits, as you requested. What you did looks great. At one point you asked whether addresses go on garages, and your decision was correct; addresses do not go on garages when they're a separate building from the main house. Let me know if you have any further questions.

Happy mapping!

111522990 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
I reviewed your edit, as you requested. I went ahead and put the tags in the proper format. Thank you for your contribution!

111541651 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
The secondary road tag is for roads of middling importance in a region's transportation network. As I'm sure you're aware, the Mount Washington Auto Road is a privately owned and operated path to the summit, as far from important as you can get. I am changing it back to unclassified.

111515860 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
The southern border of Weber County runs in the middle of the channel of the Weber River. Can you please put it back?

111247513 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
I reviewed your edit as you requested, and it looks quite nice. I've noticed that you've been adding a lot of buildings, and, fyi, there's a cool application called RapiD that helps with that. The data in it is several years old, so it wouldn't help with new developments like what you added in this changeset. But a lot of the time it helps speed things along. Here's a link to the entry page: https://mapwith.ai/.

111216192 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
I undid this change because this stretch of roadway is still used quite often. I tagged it with ownership=private to mark that it is not a public highway. When deleting former roadways, please only do so to roadways that are no longer used and not the only way to access properties.

111189270 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
There isn't a little path here. The asphalt connects through to the other side and there is a barrier. The barrier is tagged with motor_vehicle=no because it looks like it is immovable. Please stop drawing a little path here.

110885223 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
In this edit you deleted a whole bunch of service roads associated with a new development off of Corporate Drive. I restored the service roads assuming that you were in error because you were looking at old imagery.

110637307 almost 4 years ago

Here is a press release from the turnpike authority. Yes, the tolls are no longer collected at the entry ramp too. https://www.nh.gov/dot/media/nr2019/20191230-merrimack-toll.htm

110808973 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
These look like perfectly valid paths to me. Is it against park rules to stray from marked paths in the Needles?

110680990 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
I think that VT 113 from US 5 to the NH border should still be tertiary. I know state routes in VT should rarely be tertiary, but I think that this is one of those cases for a few reasons. It basically just goes to the bridge, the bridge itself is pretty sketchy, on the NH side it isn't a numbered state route, and Lyme village is quite small. It's important to have coherence at the border. Is it alright if we change it back?

110637307 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
The tolls have been removed from Exit 11. Whatever data source you are using is incorrect.

105449659 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
I'm not sure what you mean by linking this. It doesn't show the new street to the southwest of Tinker.

110193575 almost 4 years ago

While in the editor, go to the sidebar on the right and press the Background Settings button (the one that looks like three pieces of paper stacked on top of each other). That opens a menu with a whole bunch of options for background imagery.

110233082 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
You must not have gotten my message earlier, so I'll try again. Most buildings have right angles, and the editor that you are using has a few tools to help you draw correct angles. When you select a building and press "q", it will fix the angles. Or you can right click on the building and press the button that looks like a square. The squaring tool can only do so much though, and buildings should be drawn much more carefully to begin with.

110193575 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I see that you have been focusing on buildings across NH, so I wanted to give some tips on mapping them. We try to map the bases of buildings, not the roofs. Most buildings have right angles, and the editor that you are using has a few tools to help you draw correct angles. When you select a building and press "q", it will fix the angles. Or you can right click on the building and press the button that looks like a square. Also, the Bing aerial imagery isn't great in a lot of places. I recommend using Esri World Clarity, Esri World, or Mapbox imagery when tracing buildings.

Happy mapping!

110137928 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. In OSM, the access=no tag means that not even the landowners use the way. access=private means that the way is open to the landowners and their guests. Please see osm.wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate for more information. I have checked the edits you made last night and fixed them accordingly.

110140522 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed this edit, as you requested. To answer your question about mapping trails in washes, there isn't a one-size-fits-all solution. In a wide wash, trails often favor one side over the other, and in that case it makes sense to draw the trail on that bank. In narrower areas or where there isn't a favored side, then the stream and the trail can share nodes.

109779143 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
In this changeset, you deleted the Sky Mountain Golf Course. In other changesets, you deleted many features at this and other golf courses. In OpenStreetMap, we try not to delete things that exist and instead improve upon them. Please be aware of this. I am partially reverting this changeset to restore the golf course that you deleted here.

109651692 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contribution! I reviewed your edit, as you requested. I went ahead and fixed the tags on the building in Moab to be in standard OSM formats. I also undid the changes you made to that building in Lehi. You set the tags to be the same as the building in Moab, including the address. Moab and Lehi are very far apart, and it'd be quite bad if someone tried to get directions to your business in Moab and they ended up at some house in Lehi!