aweech's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
118102867 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
117690060 | over 3 years ago | There's literally an asphalt path visible in both the street level imagery and aerial imagery that goes most of the way to the path along the railbed (which is on private property itself by the way). And there's a privacy barrier between the backyard for lot B-3104 and the unpaved part of the path. The path from Lojko Drive existed for at least 5 years, way more than "never", and it likely still exists. |
117690060 | over 3 years ago | Ways can exist on private property as well. Since you didn't say that the landowners demolished the asphalt path, I'll add it back with proper tags. |
117799283 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
117690060 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
117404297 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
116888653 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
116934199 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
116843751 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
116557713 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
116503354 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
110823461 | over 3 years ago | I've been thinking about it, and I think it'd be best to bring it up at the meeting next week for a synchronous discussion. It is tricky how the northbound traffic out of downtown splits into thirds. I don't know if Martijn already invited you, but, in case he hasn't, he's organizing a discussion session so we can hash out a more organize approach and some of the particulars like this, SR 12, the Timp Highway, and other places. https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Utah/events/283188005/ |
116323976 | over 3 years ago | I found this changeset from OSMCha doing my daily reviews; I am very familiar with the tools to visualize changesets. Perhaps the thing you're confused about is when I said that this is a bus stop, not a store? I had assumed that MapRoulette brought you here due to your changeset comment and that you had unthinkingly accepted its recommended change, as so many people do. Maybe you went outside the bounds of the challenge to make the naming error. I did say further up the chain that the error was in changing the name to "Burlington", not the amenity type. My apologies that my language confused you. |
116348213 | over 3 years ago | I did look that up and considered changing it to that, but I decided that the original mapper would have had a reason for spelling it that way, maybe even a survey. Of course, most MTA bus stops don't have posted names or numbers at all, even designated stops like this one, so the best thing to do is probably remove the name altogether. |
116323976 | over 3 years ago | Your edit changed the name of the bus stop to an incorrect name, not an incorrect amenity type. The name of the bus stop is still Burlington Coat Factory and likely will be for a very long time. |
116173049 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
116323976 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
116321541 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
Thank you for your contributions. Sincerely,
|
110823461 | over 3 years ago | Actually, what people do is go over Victory to get to downtown. It's what my grandfather and all of his colleagues did when he worked in a bank tower downtown, and it's what I did when I commuted to the U. Who knows why we do it; maybe avoiding stop lights or something. But it's the way people drive. |
110823461 | over 3 years ago | I just noticed this changeset when I wondered why Beck Street was no longer primary. While it is true that the new exit is favored by routers, loads of people still use Beck Street to access downtown from the north. In the UDOT data I looked it, it gets twice the traffic of 600 North. |