Nope. We're all good. I've been doing this for a year now and I probably learn something new every day. Just keep on mapping and don't worry about breaking anything. We can always fix up innocent mistakes later.

Well, I tried to restore it along with history, but my editor and restoration tool has a bug so I couldn't do it the easy way. I've gone ahead and drawn it out by hand instead.

Yes. I'll make sure of it. (I'm surprised to hear about Shiva being gone. I used to eat there when I lived in MV.)

No worries. Glad to have more people improving the data. Adding the building back is better because it will save the history of the element. But it is a little tricky. I'll go ahead and restore it for you.
If you ever have any questions, feel free to reach out.

Thanks for the contributions @tricalnikhil. Did the building get torn down, or just the business closed up shop? If the building is still there, the outline should remain and just the tagging should be changed.

Hi Mikala, there is a great feature in iD that will help you "square" the corners of buildings that you are drawing. Just right click on the line after you have finished it and select "Square". It looks like you are mostly drawing houses. You can tag each house as `building=house` to make them more than just a generic rectangle.

amenity=cafe should be used on businesses that are publicly accessible. we don't want to be sending someone down a residential road looking for a sandwich where none are to be had.

Something very strange happened to the shape of the "guest house". I tried to fix it up. Please check and see if correct now. (Also, it shouldn't be named "Guest House". Descriptions of things shouldn't be used as their name. There is a description tag that would be more appropriate.)

I read up on riverbanks on the wiki (osm.wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank) and think I have this correct now. Would you agree, @bp0410?

Oops. Did it again. Too quick on taking the default comments for the changeset. They really should say something about cleaning up self-intersecting ways, not about the river changes from my previous work.

It looks like a river should look to me. What feature isn't loading for you? Maybe you could take a screenshot and make it available somewhere.

Sorry about that. I missed cleaning up tags on the newly created inner polygons of the multipolygon. I've corrected that now. Does it look better? If not, please give me some details on what you believe is wrong with it.

Thanks @bp0410. I'll take a look.

Hi there @AKLAB. Thanks for all of your contributions. The area looks great. But you might want to know about a couple of problems with your landuse areas that you are creating. The first problem is that a way is not supposed to cross back onto itself. So when you are drawing a landuse area using a street like a cul de sac, you are going up the street and then using the same nodes going back down the street. This causes validation problems. Another problem is that you aren't supposed to connect an area to a way. The best way I've seen to create landuse=residential is to trace the sidewalks and not the center-line road way.

Two single-node ways and 8 nodes without tags that were all in the same location were removed in osm.org/changeset/64587379

Hi @kbzimmer. Thanks for adding all of these new OSM features. One thing you should know is that outlines of buildings (ways) shouldn't cross over themselves. For example, osm.org/way/635768307 kind of does a figure eight around some buildings that possibly meet at their corners. The outline should go around the entire outside of the building and not cross itself. You can see the difference in my change.
Also, I think that DigitalGlobe has newer imagery than Bing and a couple of these buildings no longer exist. You might want to switch to using the later satellite imagery.

Hello @meyer407. These nodes are all empty and part of a relationship that also includes a single-node way. I'm pretty sure this is in error and I've deleted the nodes, relationship and the way. If this was part of an ongoing project, let me know and I can revert my clean-up effort.

Go Bulldogs!

@jwbrett, it looks like you moved a node 1700ft and skewed a bunch of connected roads. Any chance you can go back and repair/revert it? The node is osm.org/node/197740540

Hi @jpmartin1977. I don't know much about bus routes and how to map them, but I checked with others and they agreed that the EZRider relation isn't mapped correctly. If I'm not mistaken, you aren't suppose to draw an additional way, but instead add existing road ways into a relation. Sorry I can't be more help explaining the right way.

Why are there 8+ streams all in the same path?