Hi there skinnyhunt05. I removed the golf cart paths that duplicated the existing residential roads on Barleywood, Collinwood, and Glenwood Drives, and Village Parkhouse Gatehouse Road and added a "golf_cart=yes" tag to the existing roads to indicate that golf carts are allowed there. As I understand it, a duplicate path shouldn't be used, but instead have appropriate tags added to existing roads. If you know otherwise, please let me know. Thanks.

I've removed the new Cinemark that you created since there is already one defined. If I'm misunderstanding the purpose for the duplicate, please let me know. Thanks.

Hi there. Thanks for making a bunch of contributions to the map. I just wanted to point out a couple small problems so that you can avoid them in your future mapping sessions. First, sidewalks shouldn't have a "name=Sidewalk" tag. Instead, there is a "footway=sidewalk" tag that should be used. Second, ways shouldn't cross over themselves or double back on themselves. So in this change, where you come to a corner, and then double back away from the corner, a new path should be started.
No need to clean up what you've already done, I'll take care of the ones that I find, but if you could keep these in mind in the future, it would be appreciated.
Thanks, and keep up the great mapping.

Hi Twissler. First off, thanks for the work you're putting into updating the map. Unfortunately this particular change has a lot of problems so I've reverted it back to before you did you changes. When you shifted that bike path, the ends of the path where it connected with other ways got all messed up and created a big problem to clean up.
I'm guessing you shifted it because it wasn't matching a satellite image of the area that you were using. Unfortunately, this is quite common and isn't easy to deal with and know which imagery set is correct and which is off by several meters. You don't mention using additional data sources like GPS traces to verify that your imagery was correct, so I'm not sure your move was actually making things better or not. If you did, my apologies and I'll see what I can do to help you reset things back to the way you had them. Feel free to reach out.

A-ha. I see it now. I'm not used to Bing having the most up-to-date satellite imagery, so I didn't even bother to check. My bad. I went ahead and applied my changes again (with the correct path this time). The loop was drawn such that it reused nodes on the way back to the main path. This is considered a no-no and should have started with a new path. Thanks for the quick reply.

Hey Joe, can you tell me why you reverted my changes? Was there a specific problem with them, or did my changes get caught up in some larger issues? I'd like to understand before I reapply them because there are certain problems with 825077740 that need to be addressed and don't want my changes reverted again without good cause. Thanks.

Hi MojaveNC, a small portion of West State Street was deleted in this change. Was that intentional?

Hi AduptUniform, thanks for the additions to OSM. Are you using satellite imagery (or local knowledge) that is relatively new? The area I'm looking at has this going through a parking lot and I'm wondering why a living street exists in a parking lot. Has there been some construction there I'm not aware of? Thanks.

Thanks!

Is there any chance I can convince you to delete the way until you are ready to finish? I'm trying to keep the country free of the "self-intersection" errors and this one keeps showing up on the list. Thanks.

Hello KneeKnocker. Can you fix up the relation for this golf course? The course shouldn't use things like sandtraps and cartpaths as "inner" relations. It's like you are saying everything there is the golf course EXCEPT sand traps, those aren't part of the golf course. If you need some help with understanding inner relations better, let me know.

Hey Alan, can you take another look at osm.org/way/29795501? Several nodes got deleted and now the polygon is a figure eight, which I'm guessing isn't what what intended.

There are some problems with this way. The first is that is intersects and overlaps itself in many places. The second is that it is untagged, so I have no idea what it is. Can you fix it up please? Thx.

Hi there. Can you take another look at osm.org/way/780861268. It claims to be a room, but since it crosses over itself, it is impossible to tell if the inner box is a room, or if the outer box (minus the inner donut hole) is the room. It would be good if you could break that way up so that it doesn't do this (technically, ways aren't supposed to intersect with themselves). Thanks.

Hi Daniel. I'm not sure how or why this change was done, but I have reverted it to move the water way back to its original place. If you need some help with a change, let me know what you were trying to do and I'll see if I can help you get it done.

Hi there, can you clarify the tagging and geometry of osm.org/way/815603054 ? It is listed as a gate, but I'm guessing it should be a fence or wall or something. Also, the geometry is drawn in such a way that it doubles back on itself, which isn't allowed. Can you fix that as well? Thanks.

Hi pwhite. You might want to take a look at osm.org/node/1787821171#map=14/39.6212/-79.8103
It looks like a large set of points were accidentally shifted a large distance. And since the changeset involves hundreds of changes, I'm not sure if reverting it would even work.
Can you take a look into fixing things up?

Are you familiar with the sidewalks in this area? One in particular is drawn in such a way that it doubles back on itself (nodes A-B-C-B-A) and also includes an "incline" tag. I tried to fix the fact that it shouldn't double back on itself, but then the question arose of which way the incline actually points (A-B-C or is it C-B-A) if that makes sense. Is this something you can fix because you might have local knowledge? Thanks (and thanks for the contributions).

Thanks for the additions, but you might want to know that you shouldn't but anything under the name tag that isn't the actual name of the feature. For instance, osm.org/way/773920089 shouldn't have a name at all.

Looks like osm.org/way/562085214 got messed up during your change. Can you take a look at correct it? I'm not sure what the intent was here. Thanks.