Ah, that's too bad. Last Chance Reservoir would be a great name for it too. Thanks for the correction.

Hi. I just stumbled across this change and was wondering. Is that reservoir really named "Last Change"? Seems like "Last Chance" would be a more appropriate name. Possible typo?

Hello Emilio,
According to osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop stop signs shouldn't be on a way, but only on a node. I thought you might want to correct this change and move the stop to one of the nodes.

Hi @travis0,

You added a stop sign to a way instead of a node on way 229548728. I think it should be moved onto the node instead of the way in order to be technically correct. I would have done it myself, but the satellite imagery I was looking at wasn't clear that there was a stop sign on the one node that you modified, so I was a little confused.

Thanks for the contribution @jmckray. I've added a tag to indicate the area is a house. Though it looks like the area includes some sort of yard/patio and should be reduced to include just the house to be accurate.

osm.org/way/543626436 seems to be a very odd shape that doesn't correlate to any ground features. It is listed as Forest, but includes several residences, and excludes nearby forest area that is likely part of the same forest system. Is this way added in error?

Is 5 MPH a "reasonable" speed limit in your opinion, or what is officially posted for the street? If it isn't official, it should be left blank.

Zebras cross through buildings? I'm thinking this edit is bogus.

I don't know the area, but a quick review of the maps published by the ski resort show Blue Valley to be between Frank's Flight and Three Creeks. This addition has Blue Valley on the outside and it and F.F. seem to be essentially the same run (according to existing sat imagery). Guess I'll have to grab a GPS and try each run several times to get some average waypoints.

While 5 MPH might seem like a reasonable speed, if it isn't officially posted as 5 MPH, it would be better to just leave that tag unset. And if this is a dead end, you should look into properly connecting it (or not connecting it in this case) to Freedom Dr. Maybe foot traffic can go through, but cars can't? There are some barriers that can be placed on the map, but I don't know them off of the top of my head.

Thanks for mapping!

Levi Lane appears to go through someone's backyard and makes it so they have to cross the street to get to their private swimming pool. Is the imagery that out of date?

Why was way 5343133 deleted exactly? It didn't quite line up with the sat imagery, but it was close enough that it should be left IMO. Some of your deleted ways were clearly bogus and should be deleted, but some seem like they could have been left. As someone that has been lost on logging roads, I'd rather have something slightly off than completely deleted.

@PhenS: alternatively, you could tag the way as "service=driveway", "surface=gravel", "access=private" if you wanted.

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing by tracing so many buildings! On this particular change, there is a spurious area way that snuck in that I'm going to delete. And I'm going to unname the building since it looks like you might have accidentally added your change comments ("created building") to the actual name of the building.

Will do.

This can't possibly be an actual footpath, can it? I don't see any paths in imagery and it zigzags through houses and yards. Should this be deleted? Was it an editing error?

Or maybe this is a lane only for buses and that is why it is access=no. If that is the case, I'm confused about the parking lot being a one-way road with no apparent way to exit without going into the bus lane. I'll hold back on any change until I can survey or hear back from someone.

The following way shouldn't be tagged as "access=no" IMO. Can you confirm please? I'm going to revert it to be open access.

This seems overly complex. What exactly is trying to be accomplished here? Are you drawing paths or trying to create an area that is part of the college. All of the doubling back of paths seems too much. Please enlighten me.

The parking structure labelled as "Apple Mathilda 4" is a shared parking lot between Apple and LinkedIn. Does Apple really give parking structures building numbers? Either way, it should be noted that it is an Apple/LinkedIn parking structure.