Disappointed (But Not Surprised)
Posted by blackboxlogic on 23 July 2020 in English. Last updated on 2 August 2020.Facebook and ESRI announced they were adding additional data-sources into their iD fork called rapiD. They’ve collected data sources, performed schema translation, and created a conflation tool, but after being asked to follow the import process, they’ve insisted it’s not an import and they don’t need to solicit community feedback.
So here’s some feedback which they might have gotten from the community, if they had asked.
MapWithAI Data Source License
-
The Services Data is made available to you under the terms of the MIT license.
I’m not a lawyer, but the MIT license isn’t compatible with ODbL and OSM. This could lead to all edits from rapiD needing to be reverted. Each data source license should be documented inside OSM’s wiki, with your import proposal. -
You may not ... reverse-engineer any of the software
you forbid critical analysis of your import. Nice. -
you accept any changes to the Terms by continuing to use the Services after We post the changes
Truly evil!
MapWithAI Data Source Quality
- The AI generated way geometry looks good, but the
highway
tag values seem consistently wrong. The acceptable error rate for an import is debatable, I aim for > 95% accuracy in my work. It is irresponsible to even suggest low quality data. You should prompt the user to supply thehighway
tag’s value instead.