never edited here - what are you on about?

never edited here - what are you on about?

It is your fault - you made the edit after being requested not to make such edits. You obviously don't want to be part of a community but just do your own thing regardless.

Roundabout was split for bus route relation.Please don't combine roundabout ways. You're ignoring my previous request not to do this

Correctd to layer 1

Please remove obscenities from your comments. It's offensive

Please remove obscenities from your comments. It's offensive

Please remove obscenities from your comments. It's offensive

Please remove obscenities from your comments It's offensive.

You might well have done. But when? Currently the northern end has a 7 ft high padlocked security gate with vicious spikes on it which leads into a builders storage area filled with security fencing panels with a fence behind it. The southern end has a padlocked gate followed by a highway maintenance barrier which leads into undergrowth which would need a machete to clear it - let alone secateurs. It is clearly no longer a path and whoever controls the land clearly does not intend it be used a path and it obviously cannot be used as a path so why insist on confusing users of OSM that this is a pedestrian route? Which is why I've mapped what is on the ground - no path!

There is no path here

I'm deleting this changeset due to use of obscenity

If you want to be respected as a member of this community, please be courteous enough to wait for a reply to a changeset comment before reverting. I've deleted this path again, having surveyed the area this morning to confirm there is no path here

Yes: it doesn't exist.

I have no idea - I must have a had brainfart when editing this. Just delete the tag

Is this correct? When I surveyed the buildings they had separate signs on each one. Should the Day Hospital be re-named Optegra Eye Hospital Birmingham now the Uni has sold it? Was the Brain Centre sold to Optegra too- web sites are unclear?

You are correct. But please respect West Midlands community practice which is we don't tag CUS stops with highway=bus stop unless we've surveyed and found the CUS stop has been upgraded with a pole which can be surveyed. Physically present=no was a very early attempt at quality assurancec on the naptan data and has kind of just hung around. Perhaps we should tag CUS stops with the new public transport schema by placing a public_transport=stop_position node on the way adjacent to the naptan CUS node

Please don't unless you've surveyed the site and found a physical bus stop pole. The West Midands imported the Naptan data WITHOUT the bus stop tag so that we could survey the naptan data. We found naptan data is often wildly inaccurate. Locally we don't tag CUS with a bus stop tag. You might find some CUS stops are tagged with a bus stop tag- that's because the naptan data is now very old and in the meantime many CUS stops have been upgraded with a physical pole and can therefore be mapped by survey

This is a notation by NapTAN- the national database for bus stops which denotes it is a CUStomary stop i.e there is no physical bus stop present but the local drivers and passengers know that the bus stops there on request. We don't tag these as bus stops

OK by me. I've also changed the spur at the end of the road in question