Outline looks good. Don't forget to add the operator, and make sure the address has no abbreviations.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63346235

Outline looks okay, tagging looks great. Could you add who operates this building?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63346159

Tagging and outline both look good! Make sure you add as much information as you can - who operates this building?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63346139

The North Myrtle Beach fire station looks rectangular on further inspection. The zigzag seems to just be the roof. Could you fix that outline?

The Little River fire station is tagged properly, though could you copy all the tags from the old point onto the new building outline and then delete the old point?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63346882

Good outline, good tagging. I think you accidentally removed the building=yes tag from this outline, though - could you add it back in?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63346809

The concave notch on the east end of the building looks like it shouldn't be there. Otherwise, good outline and good tagging!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63346016

It seems like you accidentally moved a railway crossing into the middle of a strip mall. I went ahead and undid that for you - no biggie.

Conway doesn't operate any of these buildings - Horry County Courthouse is run by Horry County, and the Post Office is run by USPS. Go ahead and change these to their correct operators.

Don't forget to put all the tags onto the new building outline to get full points. If there is an old partially-tagged point for the building you're drawing, copy all its tags to the new building outline and then delete it.

Also - did you mean to draw a couple of buildings in Conway, Pennsylvania? The effort is appreciated and welcome, although I want to remind you that buildings outside of Horry County won't get your team any points.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63346533

The building outline looks good. Though right now there's a separate point that has most of the important tags. Could you copy all the tags of the point onto the building outline, and then delete the point? (also, the "operator" should be the official name of the local fire department)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63345783

The operator should be the name of your school district, and don't forget you'll have to draw the building outline (and copy all the tags to it) to get full points. The tagging looks otherwise complete though.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63346703

Hi! The tagging of the building looks complete. Good job on that.

It looks like there are some service roads on the east side of the building that have since been demolished; you can go ahead and delete them to make room for the building.

The building itself doesn't quite match up with where it seems to be on satellite imagery. Could you go ahead and change it so that it does?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63346397

Good use of the circularize tool when drawing! Though what you drew is actually not a building, and should instead be tagged with natural=water and water=wastewater. See: osm.wiki/Tag:water=wastewater
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63208802

whoops, not sure how that got there. fixing

Hi, I noticed you upgraded this section of TX 71 to motorway. It was intentionally tagged as a trunk road because it has at-grade RIRO intersections on both sides, which aren't up to freeway standards.

In good faith, I've reverted this section back to trunk. Whenever you upgrade roads to motorways in the future, make sure you upgrade the adjacent onramps and offramps to motorway_link.

Thanks for your understanding, and happy mapping!

Whoa there. You're starting an edit war. This is not okay.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57754944

Alright, I'm back and my head's clear. Thanks for giving me some time.

I want to make sure we're on the same page with a few things. I'm avoiding being strict on tagging, and there's a few FM/RM roads I've tagged higher than secondary as well as state/US highways lower than primary. It's still context-dependent.

After spending a lot of time reviewing untouched TIGER data in various parts of Texas that I've visited, I've come across frustratingly many cases where FM/RM roads were tagged as tertiary and needed to be upgraded, whether urban or rural. It doesn't seem to matter where—there's always going to be something (e.g. county roads, small city thoroughfares) that fits in between FM/RM roads and residential roads in the local hierarchy.

And, as state highways are generally (but not always) higher-priority and longer-distance than FM/RM roads, and roughly as connective and well-maintained as US highways, I upgraded many of them to match that.

Though admittedly I ended up indiscriminatingly upgrading a lot of FM/RM roads that don't connect any population centers at all. And this is clearly a case where FM/RM roads fit in as tertiary on the hierarchy. My bad.

Going forward, I'll be more conservative changing FM/RM roads to secondary. And in the end I'll review the FM/RM roads I previously upgraded, and downgrade the ones that don't connect population centers.

How does this sound to y'all?

Alright, I'll put a pause to this change for a bit. I want to continue this discussion later, though right now I think I just need to take a break. Thanks for being patient.

State highways and US highways in Texas are often built to the same standards and are otherwise indistinguishable. Sometimes they may be widened, but that can happen anywhere regardless of whether it's a state highway or a US highway. I don't see a convincing case for why similarly-built highways in Texas should have different designations just based on their status as a US or a state highway. It's not "inflated"; it's consistent.

Texas has rather high standards for maintaining FM/RM roads. Many of them connect up with regular state roads in OK and NM that are already tagged as secondary. I believe FM/RM roads should be secondary whenever they form a connective network of well-maintained roads in between state/US highways, which leaves room for lower-quality county and municipal thoroughfares to be tertiary.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56508945

Most of the "two lane rural state highways" in Texas have already been tagged as primary roads. It makes sense for them to be tagged as such, because they form a connective network of uniform, well-maintained, high-speed roads across the state. If you'd like to add lane numbers and speed limits to them, that'd certainly help!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56504627

Ah, I should mention that. I chose to add it because most of these frontage roads are already marked as `note=frontage`. I didn't like that it was taking over the `note` tag, but I didn't want to delete useful information, so I moved the information to a new tag. I'm okay with having a critical discussion of this if you have any concerns.