Hi Steve - I thought we had a discussion on this months ago. Shouldn't these ways remain `railway=rail` and not `railway=light_rail`? Light rail vehicles can travel on temporally restricted `railway=rail`, but freight trains can't travel on `railway=light_rail`.

Hi - I'm on vacation for a week. I'll take a look at this when I'm back.

Hi ironmatic1. usage=tourism is a documented tag with extensive use. Tracks can indeed be tagged as usage=tourism, regardless of whether they show up on OpenRailwayMap. If they don't show up, that is a problem with OpenRailwayMap's renderer and not with the underlying data. I've gone ahead reverted these tracks to usage=tourism.

Hi Nick,

The platforms at Clybourn were intentionally divided down the middle to preserve information about which routes stop on which side, as well as avoid creating multipolygons. Technically it could be mapped either way, but as a railway mapper, I find it easier to maintain when platforms are mapped as ways without multipolygon relations. I hope you don't mind me changing it back.

-Clay

Oops, should have been under my personal account

Changeset reverted here: osm.org/changeset/115435567

The LA Metro G Line is not a guided busway. A quick read of the wiki page for busways could have prevented you from making this mistake: osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway

Honestly there wasn't much thought behind it. I put it in that order because I felt US 62 was sort of a hodgepodge of other roads that formed a neat grid. It doesn't reflect any on-the-ground reality.

No worries! Just curious. I went ahead and reverted it.

Why did you change the Metra 47th Street Yard from railway=service_station to railway=yard? This facility does not handle freight.

Hi Nick,

Could you explain what the ref value of "FAP 370" represents, and why it was applied on such a short segment of Western Boulevard?

In the future, please use more descriptive changeset comments than "adding details". Consider being more specific on what kinds of details you're adding. If you can summarize what you've worked on, it saves a lot of time and effort on the part of other mappers.

-Clay

It could, but it'll simply be re-added shortly after by someone else. If you choose to keep deleting things that exist in the real world, like this driveway, you may lose your permission to edit again.

Sorry to inform you, but there's really nothing you can do about that.

No worries, thanks for understanding.

Hi Ian,

Looks like you merged the Amtrak station node with the building outline here. Since the node represents the whole station, rather than just the building, please keep them separate going forward.

Partially reverted here: osm.org/changeset/114714240

Hi matteditmsts,

Looks like you merged the Amtrak station node with the building outline here. Since the node represents the whole station, rather than just the building, please keep them separate going forward.

Partially reverted here: osm.org/changeset/114714143

It looks like this changeset mistakenly merged the node for the Mystic Amtrak station with the station building outline. Since the node represents the whole station, rather than just the building, please keep them separate going forward.

Partially reverted here: osm.org/changeset/114713974

Hi Arlo. I noticed you merged the Amtrak station node with the building outline here. The station node (along with the public_transport relation) represents the whole station, which the building is just a part of. In the future, please keep them separate.

Partially reverted here: osm.org/changeset/114713714

Hi Michael,

It looks like you've mistakenly deleted the station node here. Buildings are not stations—please keep them separate. If you choose to map a train station as a way, map an area covering the entire station including platforms.

Changeset partially reverted here: osm.org/changeset/114194156

These roads are variably signed as "CR 600 E" or simply "600 E". I can see the rationale for removing the route relations. I'll pop in on the mailing list.

It may not necessarily be high speed, but it does at least have relatively low intersection density and it's designed for continuous traffic flow. Would you consider the lower speed limit to be a dealbreaker for expressway=yes?