Congrats, your test worked! But this road is not supposed to be a motorway (that tag is for freeways) so I'm going to change it back to how it was.

This road has been closed as WSDOT recently removed the signals from this intersection and made it RIRO. I'm going to remove the cross street here.

Is this building REALLY that big? You probably should fix this...

Is I-5 still closed here?

Don't tag an area as a building unless it actually represents the building's footprint. I just fixed this for you, so don't sweat it too much, but just try and avoid such tagging in the future. Thanks!

Why did you change US 60 from trunk to secondary? It's important enough to at least be primary.

The motorway tag is only for roads that are actually freeways with at least 2 lanes in each direction, a median dividing both directions of traffic, and controlled access. This road does not meet those qualifications and should not be tagged as a motorway. Please change it back. Thanks!

Just because a road has houses along it doesn't mean it can't be marked trunk.

Is there a reason why you added the access=no tag to part of Sandpoint Way just west of Children's Hospital?

Why are link roads not supposed to have a name? Having a name on these roads is helpful when it comes to routing. Instead of saying "exit roundabout onto unnamed road," it would say "exit roundabout on 100th Street Northeast," which is obviously way more helpful to the end user than the former.

Thanks for pointing this out; I just did an edit to fix this issue.

Many of the roads you changed from trunk to motorway should be changed back to trunk. A motorway is basically a freeway with limited access and full grade separation. In the US, a trunk road is any road that has some freeway-like characteristics (eg. four lanes, divided) but does not have full grade separation or something like that. Please change the roads that you edited back to how they were before, unless you are absolutely certain they should be marked motorways.

Please do not change the name for a node for a city label. Your edit would have been much more helpful if you added a node at the actual location of this store.

Sorry, second sentence should read: This use of the building=* tag where landuse=* or amenity=* [u]would be more appropriate[/u] is a big pet peeve of mine, though...

All good man; I think I fixed all the problematic ones. This use of the building=* tag where landuse=* or amenity=* is a big pet peeve of mine, though...

Do not add the building = yes or building = school tag to the way that defines the school grounds. Such tags are for the way that defines the building footprint. I am going to fix the affected ways for you, but please avoid doing this in the future. Thanks!

Only use the building=* tag to tag the building footprint. It should not be used to tag an a commercial area. Use the landuse=commercial tag for this. Thanks!

Those slip lanes that you added are no longer there. If you look at the most recent aerial imagery (the Esri imagery) you'll notice that the intersection has been reconfigured and they're no longer there. That took place two years ago, btw.

The bridge should be back open now; you can change the tags if you wish.

Has this road reopened yet?