compdude's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
98953336 | over 4 years ago | Having not heard any response from you, I'm changing this back to trunk. |
100560580 | over 4 years ago | Agree with btwhite92 here. I'd say most US editors would say that there needs to be at least 2 consecutive interchanges for a road to be considered motorway instead of trunk. Please change this back; thanks! |
100967677 | over 4 years ago | When you downgrade roads from trunk to primary, please *always* provide an explanation saying why you're downgrading that road. It's really, really helpful to others, thanks! |
98953336 | over 4 years ago | I haven't heard back from you but I really think this should be a trunk road. Any objections to me changing it back? Have you driven this road yourself? |
80002393 | over 4 years ago | Is this part of Provincial Road 200 still closed? |
97654860 | over 4 years ago | Clearly looks like a trunk to me. |
97668934 | over 4 years ago | This clearly looks like a trunk to me. |
98090961 | over 4 years ago | There's a very good reason why this is trunk. It is a divided highway. There's no minimum length requirement for how long a divided highway has to be for it to be trunk. Please change this back; thanks! |
98203868 | over 4 years ago | This is clearly a trunk given that it is a divided highway. Please change it back, thanks! |
98430653 | over 4 years ago | But it does meet the qualifications of trunk being that it is almost up to freeway standards with the grade separation. |
98677670 | over 4 years ago | Again, why is this primary? At first glance, this looks like a trunk to me. |
98691442 | over 4 years ago | Can you please make more descriptive changeset descriptions? I have absolutely no idea what this means. It really doesn't take that long.... |
98737846 | over 4 years ago | Have you verified in the aerial imagery that this entire area is actually forests, with no clearings or anything? I find that hard to believe that this *entire* area is all forest. |
98742072 | over 4 years ago | FYI, in Canada, the standards for motorway seem to be different than the US in that they seem to agree that super-twos like this road can be tagged as motorway. There are many super-twos in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia that are tagged as motorway, as well as the the two-lane sections of A-50 in Quebec. In the US, we seem to have come to the agreement that super-twos are trunk, but that does not seem to be the case in Canada. It's important to familiarize yourself with tagging conventions in other countries when you do edits outside of the US. |
98828543 | over 4 years ago | Why is this not a trunk? It looks like it should be a trunk to me. Also, in the future, if you are downgrading a road from trunk please explain why in the change description. |
98953336 | over 4 years ago | I drove this road this past October and it's definitely a trunk. It has a 50 mph speed limit, which I'd say is high enough to qualify as trunk. |
78103766 | over 4 years ago | How are these not trunk roads? They most definitely meet the agreed-upon US definition of a trunk road being a divided highway with at-grade intersections, and from having been on those roads myself, they don't seem any different from HI 380 and HI 311 which are correctly tagged as trunk. |
90401782 | over 4 years ago | This stretch of US 6 appears to be a super-two (undivided 2 lane road with interchanges). Per agreed-upon consensus in the US community, this can and should be tagged as a trunk road. I know you made this change five months ago, but I just noticed this now. Would appreciate if if you changed it back, thanks! |
85669661 | over 4 years ago | Is the US 10 bridge over the river still under construction/closed? |
96033151 | over 4 years ago | You put the Port Angeles Seaplane Base in Kenmore which is obviously not its correct location. Could you please move it to its actual location in Port Angeles? |