compdude's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
113355463 | over 3 years ago | Is Dorena Lake really an intermittent/seasonal lake? |
114719705 | over 3 years ago | Hi, please don't tag roads as motorway unless there are at least two consecutive interchanges. I will be changing this back to trunk. |
112964403 | over 3 years ago | Also why did you edit parts of OK 37 such that they now randomly jump between trunk and secondary? |
111085779 | almost 4 years ago | I must admit that even though I've been on OSM for over ten years, I don't fully understand the highway=track tag. So don't expect to have a full, thorough understanding of the highway tags right away. |
111085779 | almost 4 years ago | I'd also suggest you look at the examples on the wiki page to get a better idea of what roads should be tagged as highway= service. |
111085779 | almost 4 years ago | Usually unclassified or track is the correct tag for a forest service road, with track being for roads only used for logging out that are no longer maintained. A service road is basically analogous to a driveway and is not on a public right of way. |
111085875 | almost 4 years ago | Hello, I noticed you tagged this as highway=road. However that tag is only to be used when the road type is not known; that was not the case here. I have changed it back to highway=unclassified. |
111085779 | almost 4 years ago | Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I saw you changed this road to highway=service; however this road is not right for this tag. It is intended for roads in parking lots, driveways, etc. See the wiki for more info: osm.wiki/Tag:highway=service?uselang=en |
111940505 | almost 4 years ago | What would you define as consensus then? |
111940505 | almost 4 years ago | Regarding consensus, I strongly encourage you to check out the discussions at slack.openstreetmap.us. |
111940505 | almost 4 years ago | >Going from trunk to primary isn't a reduction in importance, it's a reduction in the road. Yes it is, trunk roads are more important than primary roads by definition. |
111940505 | almost 4 years ago | Also, tagging short segments of road as trunk just because it happens to be divided (or a super-two) for like a mile or two is just as bad as when people tag expressways as a motorway for like a mile or so just because there happens to be one interchange. Also, if a road is primarily built as an expressway but becomes undivided in a town, it should still be tagged as trunk. The road's importance is *not* reduced when it goes thru a town. |
111940505 | almost 4 years ago | I know I've mentioned this multiple times on the talk-us mailing list but it bears repeating: the wiki states that only highway=motorway implies anything about the physical state of the road, whereas the other highway=* tags are not. The consensus in the US tagging community seems to now be that trunk roads don't necessarily need to be expressways. Please use the expressway=yes tag for expressways. |
108850916 | about 4 years ago | Hi there, none of those roads that you tagged as trunk actually meet the definition of a trunk road. Trunk roads are generally any road that is a divided highway without interchanges or a two-lane road that connects major cities. The roads you tagged as trunk really should be tagged as service roads for the most part. I would really appreciate it if you fixed this. Also, please actually provide a changeset comment to explain to other mappers what changes you've made to the map. This is way more helpful than just typing a period in the description box. |
107407743 | about 4 years ago | Can you please explain why US 95 isn't a freeway between just south exit 438 and just north of exit 446? It clearly looks like one to me, and is certainly long enough. |
107041588 | about 4 years ago | Are you on the OSM-US Slack channel? Would be happy to discuss this and get other peoples' input on there. There certainly isn't an agreement on the minimum length of motorway segments in the US. |
106846278 | about 4 years ago | The rule I mentioned is like the minimum standard for the US, as I'm certain that most people would think that it's improper tagging to upgrade a trunk to motorway if it has one interchange sandwiched between at-grade intersections. Now that I think about it, people have different ideas of what the minimum number of interchanges needed for a trunk to be upgraded to motorway. Also, for the example you provided, do note that the UK doesn't tag A roads as motorway even if they're fully grade-separated; they only tag M roads or A(M) roads as motorway, so that's different than the US. |
106907683 | about 4 years ago | Looks like this should be motorway to me. |
106926050 | about 4 years ago | Again, please explain why you feel this should be trunk. There don't appear to be any at-grade intersections, so it should be changed back to motorway. Thanks! |
107041588 | about 4 years ago | Where are the at-grade intersections on this road? I don't see any, so it should be changed to motorway. |