>I, and the FHWA, disagree that freeways can terminate at an at-grade intersection.

Really? I'd love to see a link from FHWA's website.

Also, if that's true, than how come 3dis are a thing? There are many freeways around the US that terminate at at-grade intersections. Examples just from my neck of the woods include WA 509 north of the 1st Avenue S. Bridge, WA 167 at both ends of the freeway section, the western terminus of I-90, US 12 west of Yakima, and many 3dis (including I-705, which is actually shorter than this particular freeway.

You still haven't provided me a link to a talk-us discussion indicating that your method of tagging has consensus around the OSM community. If not, this needs to be discussed there.

How is this an expressway? Anyone driving on this road south from 164th would be like "this looks like a freeway to me." (Note that I'm not the one who tagged this as a motorway; I just tagged the ramps as motorway link to match everything else)

If we applied your rule of "freeways should be tagged as trunk if they end at a surface street on one end" across the board, then just about every 3-digit interstate would have to be tagged as a trunk (even those ridiculously short ones in MT).

So, per standard practice, this should be tagged as a motorway all the way to 164th.

Nope, that's not standard practice in OSM in the US, that's just your personal opinion. I haven't seen anyone else besides you insist on tagging this way.

There are many 3-digit interstates shorter than this freeway that are tagged as a motorway; by your logic these would all have to be trunk.

Please provide some proof (e.g. talk-us discussion, wiki page) indicating that there is consensus for your way of doing things.

Perhaps you should switch to an editor that doesn't do this. Nothing wrong with using iD. I've never heard of this GoMap editor that it appears you're using.

Also, tbh I've never really been a fan of having ramps tagged as motorway instead of motorway link just because they happen to have a route number on them. You really should discuss this on the talk-us mailing list before continuing to re-tag roads in this manner.

You also deleted the name of this road. You really need to be more careful about this when you make edits to OSM.

Also I think you broke the intersection with 85th and 132nd. I'm going to fix that, but please make this road divided again.

Yes, please revert this edit. There was a reason why this road was dual carriageway because it shows that you can't cross the median. This is very important for proper routing because you don't want people to be directed to turn left across the median when this is physically impossible to do.

Again, please change this back to how it was before. Thanks!

Please stop removing oneway=yes tags from motorways. I have told you not to do this in the past yet you continue to do it.

I think it's a bit of a stretch to consider Mukilteo Speedway a trunk road as there are too many driveways and intersections and though it's divided, it's more like a typical urban arterial than an expressway with at grade intersections. I agree with having that part of SR 526 and Paine Field Blvd marked as trunk, but not Mukilteo Speedway, so I'm going to change that back to primary.

It looks like you moved the boundary of the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest by mistake when you made this edit. Can you please fix it? Thanks!

Deleting, as this user has provided no evidence that this state highway exists (despite having 6+ months to do so).

Please do not tag a road as motorway unless it's actually a freeway.

Please stop removing the oneway tags from motorways.

Please provide evidence that WA 166 is officially designated on this road. AFAIK, it doesn't extend beyond the eastern city limits of Port Orchard.

Can you provide me some evidence that WA 166 extends beyond the eastern city limits of Port Orchard?

I'm going to remove the ref tags, as you've provided no evidence that WA 907 exists.

Please don't tag a road as a motorway unless it actually is a freeway (e.g. I-5). I'd appreciate it if you changed these roads that you erroneously tagged motorway back to how they were before. Thanks!

These roads should not be tagged as motorways. The motorway tag is only for roads that are actually freeways, like I-5. Please change them back to how they were tagged before (highway=unclassified). Thanks!

Please stop removing the oneway=yes tags from motorways. Please add back the oneway=yes tag to the roads where you deleted them from. You're not supposed to delete these from motorways.

Please provide some proof that WA 222 actually exists.