🤦‍♂️

In the words of bambam, Etgg you are wrong 3 people know you are wrong why do you keep arguing against perfectly good tagging

etgg you are getting spammed haha

et) of farmland then you crack open an etgg

If you are both unintelligent enough to think that grasslands are not a type (read subs

you are both unintelligent enough to think that grasslands are not a type (read subset) of farmland then you crack

As the openstreetmap wikipedia page states(osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland), meadows can also be agricultural in the sense that they are harvested for grass.It says that any grass-covered areas are better of tagged as landuse=meadow rather than the nonstandard and somewhat conflicting tagging of 'landuse=farmland, crop=grass'.

Ok, perhaps it would be best to remove the 'main' role - I was only trying to add some detail to relations

'Main' means it is the main path of the route

I never claimed that my data source was 'Bing imagery' ,I just forgot to add the source as a survey as I did survey it and the surface is predominantly ground

100 MIL BOIIIIS!!

16 years ago…

Yes so I always tag it as private- why not

Yes, I know that a lot of it is bog.If I find any bogs Ill add them to the map and make them inner relations within the heath multipolygon

I know that, I made it a highway=path for routing purposes and to ensure that all the paths and steps in the station were connected to other roads and paths

Yes you can tell when you upload a changset it will say changset number ...

111,554,580 changesets later…

Ok ,I will add that now

ok you can creat trash maps then im out

Also creating names like that adds unnecessary clutter to the map