Hi klausreus,

du machst damit diese [1] Änderung rückgängig. Bist du dir da sicher?

Viele Grüße
David

osm.org/changeset/168597608

ist das Gasthaus in Betrieb derzeit? Dann sollte aus dem disused:tourism=guest_house wohl ein tourism=guest_house gemacht werden, denn derzeit ist das tagging widersprüchlich.

VG

David

Hi Sam35,

das surface=erd hier [1] war ein Tippfehler, oder? :)

VG

David

[1] osm.org/way/897978724

Hi,

die "Vorgaben" der Anrainer sind hier weniger relevant, beschildert ist doch "Anrainer frei" also access=destination statt access=no, oder?

Viele Grüße :)

David

Hi,

hier fehlt doch ein POI tag, oder?
also tourism=hotel o. ä.

VG

Hi,
du hast hier [1] den Namen der DAV-Selbstversorgerhütte Winklmoosalm geändert. Bist du sicher, dass das so korrekt ist? Ich glaube was du meinst ist eher der Gebäudename, nicht der Name der Schutzhütte.

Viele Grüße

David

[1] osm.org/way/158454020

hi there, no worries, i figured it was something like that.
Your changeset comment made your intentions clear, which is very helpful and made it easy to fix :)

in your editor, you can for example add the tag access=private to the part of the road. see the wiki for details

osm.wiki/Key:access

hi, please do not add test data to osm.org. I have reverted your edits.
In some cases, the testing environment at https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org can be an alterantive

osm.org/changeset/168790004

Hi, please do not upload test data to openstreetmap.org. I have reverted your edits.

You may in some cases use https://apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ for testing, if you are developing a new editor for example.

Cheers
David

osm.org/changeset/168788448

reverted, see osm.org/changeset/168743806#c1460196

osm.org/changeset/168744750

reverted, see osm.org/changeset/168743806#c1460196

osm.org/changeset/168744750

reverted, see osm.org/changeset/168743806#c1460196

osm.org/changeset/168744750

reverted, see osm.org/changeset/168743806#c1460196

osm.org/changeset/168744750

reverted, see osm.org/changeset/168743806#c1460196

osm.org/changeset/168744750

Hi Dave Stret, welcome to OSM :)

in OSM, we map what is on the ground, and therefore, deleting roads just because they are inaccessible to the general public goes against our rules. See the wiki for details [1]. You can add access=private or access=customers if there is a sign, but don't delete the roads. This ensures that emergency services, the postal service, the owners, workers, and customers can still navigate to the buildings.

I have reverted your edits. Feel free to ask if you have questions :)

Greetings

David

[1] osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

are the square brackets around the operator and operator:wikidata tag intentional or is that a mistake that happenend due to copy/paste?

david

Hi, welcome to OSM.
What did you intend to do here?

I am not sure; The square landuse=industrial does not match up to aerial imagery and even if it did its not supposed to be connected to the road.

Greetings

David

Hi,

du hast hier [1] fixme=Testeingabe eingetragen, kann das weg oder gibt es den Überflurhydranten hinterm FwH tatsächlich? :)

Viele Grüße

David

osm.org/node/7304139780

Hi,

thank you for your edits and welcome to osm :)

i dont think foot=no is appropriate here, people can walk to the houses there no problem, especially delivery services or emergency services. But you're right, its not appropriate for the general public to take a leisurly walk there. You could mark them as foot=destination, but only if thats signed there.

I would suggest adding highway=service service=driveway where appropriate.

The same applies to many of your other edits :)

Greetings

David

Duplikat entfernt osm.org/changeset/167991048