OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
112859111 almost 4 years ago

reverted with changeset #112859347

112859112 almost 4 years ago

reverted with changeset #112859347

112859229 almost 4 years ago

reverted with changeset #112859347

112859230 almost 4 years ago

reverted with changeset #112859377

112859231 almost 4 years ago

reverted with changeset #112859377

112859235 almost 4 years ago

reverted with changeset #112859377

112859236 almost 4 years ago

reverted with changeset #112859377

112859237 almost 4 years ago

reverted with changeset #112859377

112859238 almost 4 years ago

reverted with changeset #112859377

112859241 almost 4 years ago

reverted with changeset #112859377

112859242 almost 4 years ago

reverted with changeset #112859377

112858681 almost 4 years ago

Reverted vandalism with changeset #112859049

112858685 almost 4 years ago

Vandalism reverted with Changeset #112858984

112653525 almost 4 years ago

Und nochmal in der Nähe: osm.org/way/67990514 Die Treppe geht vermutlich bis zum Fußweg am Leonhardsberg?

112653525 almost 4 years ago

Hi, danke dafür! Jetzt macht es mehr Sinn!

Stimmt alles mit dem Fußweg osm.org/way/64891725 ?
Der hört momentan an der Grenze zum highway=pedestrian auf, aber hat keine Verbindung zum Belzmühlgässchen osm.org/way/23487774 oder zu dem Stückerl Fußweg ein kleines Bisserl im Süden
osm.org/way/66493737 was auch noch ein wenig unverbunden am hw=pedestrian hängt.

Grad ist mir auch was neues aufgefallen: osm.org/way/68014342 ist "parking_isle", aber der Platz ist als Fußgängerzone getaggt. Irgendwie ein Widerspruch, oder?

Merci für deine Vor-Ort-Arbeit!

69916340 almost 4 years ago

Hi Crazixs,
ich hab eine Note zur Pipeline aufgemacht:
osm.org/note/2884656
Kennst du dich in der Gegend gut genug aus um zu wissen, ob da wirklich eine Pipeline die ganze alte Stromtrasse entlang verbuddelt wurde? Wahrscheinlich nicht, oder?

84120696 almost 4 years ago

Hi, du hattest in diesem Changeset aus Versehen den Siebenbrunner Bach osm.org/way/49225264 mit Fahrrad- und Fußweg-Infos getaggt. Das hab ich wieder entfernt, aber ich weiß nicht, wo diese Infos richtig wären (es gibt ja mehrere Wege in der Nähe). Schau dir das vielleicht noch mal an, vielleicht kannst du das noch ergänzen.

106225277 about 4 years ago

Using a closed way to indicate the size of the shop is indeed possible, and is the way it's done with indoor mapping. I think it's not very popular yet, but it shouldn't do any harm either. As long as level=* is set, the QA tools should also not complain about overlapping geometries.

106294098 about 4 years ago

Address tags are meant for postal addresses, so things that can't receive mail usually don't get any addr:* But as always, there may be differences in local tagging practice...
As far as I know, the location of features in countries and districts is not very hard to find through software queries. There are shapefiles for all borders available, and they are used for things like that.

107236548 about 4 years ago

Thank you for all your thoughts in all the replies, this has been very interesting for me. I see that you have very good reasoning behind what you do! Also, I'm getting a glimpse into local culture and attitude ;-)

One nice thing about OSM is that it's very open for all interests and very much a "do-ocracy". This can be a bit confusing for data users and for new mappers, who both may wish for clearer and more consistent rules everywhere. But I think the openness and flexibility is a big part of the success and fun of OSM.