Thanks for pointing this out, and apologies for the long delay in responding. I should have deleted all these USFWS shapefile tags. My mistake, and many thanks to user mueschel for correcting it!

Why are some of the new trails in BCR tagged access=no? Are they not open to the public?

Hi user_5359,
I left these keys there in error when I imported the latest boundary from the US FWS website, in error. I've removed them. Thanks for pointing this out..
Regards
Doug

Hi Viki,
Yes, personally I think protect_class for Butano and most California state and even most county parks should be 5. They are primarily protected wild lands with limited and controlled recreational access. I don't see them as "Community Life" areas (21). And I live here and hike them a lot. And most CA parks are already tagged this way.
Regards.. doug

Hi!
Could you help me understand why the protect_class for Butano State Park should be a 21 rather than a 5? This park (like most CA parks) is essentially a protected nature preserve. Recreation activities are limited to low-impact in certain areas. It conforms well to IUCN catgory V.