oops; thanks for catching that

Hi. In the future, can you please make more elaborate changeset comments? Simply stating the area is about as useful as having none.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

If this is a continuation of your crusade against highway=footway I commented on in cs 110784465, then please acknowledge my comment instead of doing this. This isn't solving the issue. This is not a path, it's a footway and that's not where that barrier is. Please respond. let's discuss this. I don't want to involve the DWG, it's a hassle.

osm.org/way/92038140
This is not a path. You are not meant to go here except on foot. You can only get a bike through here by deliberately driving very slowly around the barrier put up specifically to stop bikes from going through. Please justify this change.

Additionally you have changed *a lot* of other ways to paths where they are not applicable. I would like to know why you are doing this?

I've said this in the Discord and I'll say it again, here.

Verbatim:
"This changeset size thing just sounds like a poor software problem, to me, not a poor practice problem. I grant my domain is very tiny, but there is a mapper in my country who makes changesets that span my entire domain pretty often, but it's all good data. I use whodidit to see what the changes actually were in the area I care about, rather than review their whole changesets everytime they cross my domain"

To add / clarify:
You have the tools available to filter out bboxes that cover your area but add nothing. That you choose not to use them, or are not aware of them, is not their problem. This particular changeset goes over my area, while changing nothing in it. This went completely over my radar because I don't go by bboxes. I literally did not even know this changeset spanned my area.

I must have been sleeping.
The actual source is the usual SDFE aerial

Hello again! I can see you've made a cycleway that doesn't really go anywhere. Specifically, this way
osm.org/way/965261133

Generally, if a sidewalk or cyclepath doesn't have any seperation from the road, such as grass, we just add it to the road itself for simplicity.
osm.wiki/Key:cycleway

That is what it is, but it doesn't go anywhere. It stops abrubtly at the edge of the crossing street, where it should ideally be connected to it. Routers can't use it, if it doesn't go somewhere.

You're making good edits, though! Keep going.

It looks like you are using highway=footway exactly as intended :)

Hi! I can see you've flagged your changesets for review. You're making good changes, but they're not completely correct. The tunnel paths you've made should ideally be tagged as building_passage and have its nodes be part of the building way.
SEE tunnel=building_passage osm.wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage

There's also the question of the accuracy. Your paths are not wildly inaccurate, but they are a bit misaligned. In an area as dense as this, everyone will appreciate it when they have to maintain this area in the future if you took a little more time to align more accurately.

Of course, we welcome to data and hope you keep going! If you have any questions, you can comment here or message me directly. I'll try my best to explain.

A lot of things seem to be broken here at any rate. Fixed it in 61593266

Added houses, not parking spots.
My bad, too quick on the trigger.

The track that I have tagged is finished and currently in use by the public. The whole track is not finished, however. I have not mapped the unfinished sections

That's a very interesting tag. Had no idea that existed.

The large building west of Rådhusparken Parking does not exist. I deleted this already, but it seems you re-added it in this changeset.

That's fair. I take it it should be changed at the other cemetery as well?

I'm gonna have to disagree with that. If you want to see a mess, look north. I map grass areas around paths when it makes sense, when the path isn't grass and isn't a desire-path.

Seems to be https://i.imgur.com/nUplgO2.jpg
These shelters in particular are also paid-to-use. I don't know if you're supposed to tags paid shelters.

I'm not sure which maps you are referring to. iD does not have any maps available that shows this area under construction.

I'm not arguing it isn't under construction, I just don't know where you're getting the aerial view from.

I read about the AWSBot, but I was not aware it would place addresses ahead of time. I drove by this area not that long ago and I noticed no construction, and the most recent aerial imagery from 2017 also shows nothing special about the area, so I assumed it to be a mistake. But, I'll note it down not to touch the adresses.

I have corrected this. I wasn't aware you could tag bike paths onto roads, since someone had started mapping the sidewalks in great detail.