Mateusz merkt alleen op dat ze usual zijn het is mijn "besluit" om daar iets mee te doen.

Ik heb, voordat ik de wijziging maakte, op osm.wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsewing gekeken en las daar:

A shop that primarily sells miscellaneous sewing supplies, such as fabric, thread, sewing machines, notions, etc.

Naar mijn idee dekt shop=sewing dus ook naaimachine winkels.

Thanks for reminding me, yes, should have split this.

Inmiddels aangepast zie ik, bedankt!

Hoi,

In deze changeset heeft het fietspad osm.org/way/671359424 lit=yes, segregated=no en smoothness=intermediate erbij gekregen en is de surface van asfalt naar :30paving_stones:30 gewijzigd

smoothness/segregated/surface lijken me niet correct aan de hand van PDOK en mapillary. Lijkt me ook niet dat die zeer recent gewijzigd is.

Klopt de wijziging voor dit stuk fietspad?

Like I wrote in the topic, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-mark-intersection-where-going-stright-is-not-allowed/104942/6 I do not see this as an improvement.

restrictions via the via as way are "valid" but they are poor supported so if things van be done using via "nodes" that has the clear preference.

Dank je voor het retaggen van paving_stones:30

This changeset added osm.org/way/1214093055 but it looks to me like that is not complete (yet).

Can you complete it?

Bedankt voor het oplosssen van osm.org/note/3584015

Hoi,

In deze changeset heb je enige paden toegevoegd met surface=paving_stones:30 en daar is nu een poll over, zie

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/paving-stones-30-en-gebruik/104143/38

In deze changeset heb je enige paden toegevoegd met surface=paving_stones:30 en daar is nu een poll over, zie

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/paving-stones-30-en-gebruik/104143/38

Hoi,

In deze changeset heb je enige paden toegevoegd met surface=paving_stones:30 en daar is nu een poll over, zie

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/paving-stones-30-en-gebruik/104143/38

Hoi,

In deze changeset heb je voetpaden met surface=paving_stones:30 toegevoegd en daar is nu een poll over, zie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/paving-stones-30-en-gebruik/104143/38

Hi,

You are changing here 0800 numbers to +31 800 but these numbers can not be reached this way for outside Netherlands, they are "free numbers".

Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/0800-nummers-en-31/104328/16 (use the translate button to translate)

https://brouter.de/brouter/suspects/TheNetherlands/Zeeland/all ziet hier nu problemen.

Niet helemaal access=customers is het (enige) "probleem" maar op osm.wiki/Tag:access=customers is te vinden:

Data consumers will generally interpret ways with access=customers as forbidden for through-traffic. For ferry services (route=ferry) and roads leading to/from ferry services, use access=permissive + toll=yes instead, to make sure that routing engines will allow usage of the ferry for through-traffic.

Also interesting you remember me of the Automated Edits code of conduct, did you yourself follow it? I searched for some evidence but could not find anything.

Reading the wiki I read: "without review individually by the person controlling the edits" and that is not what I am planning to do.

Thanks!

Hi,

We are searching for a new photo for bicycle_parking=streetpod and looking where streetpods are mapped I saw your name popping up for 8 of them in Newcastle upon Tyne partly via this changeset.

See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/finding-new-images-for-osm-wiki-help-welcomed/5423/30, we are looking for a new image with that may be freely reused.

Can you maybe provide on one more images of streetpod’s?

Greetings,

Emvee

Hi Djminisite,

We are searching for a new photo for bicycle_parking=streetpod and looking where streetpods are mapped I saw your name popping up for 15 of them in Newcastle upon Tyne and some are added using this commit.

See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/finding-new-images-for-osm-wiki-help-welcomed/5423/30, we are looking for a new image with that may be freely reused.

Can you maybe provide on one more images of streetpod’s?

Greetings,

Emvee

Interesting, searching the tagging list I found:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-August/047624.html

So then there were 3 proponents of capacity:tents=<number> and 2 proponents on tents=<number>

So, when you did your/this "automated edit", based on what did you change maxtents=<number> into tents=<number>?

Just to let you know, unless I hear something I will likely change somewhere next week the campings that in this changeset were changed from maxtents=X par tents=X into capacity:tents=X + tents=yes