OpenStreetMap
eteb3's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by eteb3
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4569106 | eteb3 | Planning applied for for ?40 dwellings |
|||
| 2162287 | Yeomanry Survey | Is this the River Bure? |
|||
| 4291474 | TheUKHighStreet | According to their facebook page this has closed
|
|||
| 2855677 | eteb3 | These mosques appear to be duplicate entries. It's hard to be sure, but a highly-regarded dataset has the mosque in the easter building, with an address of 159-161. Bing aerial (of uncertain vintage) shows bright stone paths (=redevelopment) only in the easter building, again implying that is the sole site. A puzzle is that the histories of both buildings have them as building=church. That suggests the error (if it is one) is long-standing: it seems highly unlikely to have two churches next to each other in a planned estate like this one. |
|||
| 4540106 | eteb3 | This square now has a name, forgotten |
|||
| 3804784 | Army Cadet Force Yaxley Detachment |
||||
| 3645463 | eteb3 | Proposed site of Green Meadows, a (mainly) Muslim cemetery |
|||
| 3606071 | ntzm | this cycle path doesn't exist on bing imagery |
|||
| 4516551 | eteb3 | This building is tagged as a mosque, but not as a place of worship. Baitul Ehsan Mosque, adjacent, is tagged as a place of worship, but not as a mosque. Needs a #survey to check ground truth. Obviously*, "building=mosque" is only for a building purpose-built as a mosque. By the doctrine this probably means it has some stereotypical mosquey features. *not really |
|||
| 4174849 | eteb3 | Lendal has newish retractable anti terrorism bollards. Can’t recall exactly where |