OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
55800189 over 7 years ago

It seems that the nodes you deleted were the location of a road although not tagged correctly, this is still valid map data.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55800189

22835905 over 7 years ago

This way osm.org/way/287132224/history

and this way
osm.org/way/285738017/history#map=19/10.77567/106.70366

seem to be errors, is that right? if not, they should connect to existing ways.

49137151 over 7 years ago

Hi, I have some comments about this import.

You added address nodes with several keys that don't belong on addresses:

- boundary; this is for the ward (phường) is is in? Probably should be changed to 'addr:subdistrict'
- building: should be addr:housenumber
- landuse? I don't understand what this number is for, is it a reference number to something?
- natural=TDDH, could you explain this further?
- route, this should be addr:street
- shop, these are the names of the home owners? should be simply 'name=', although maybe it should be removed for privacy reasons.

details are describer here: osm.wiki/Key:addr#Commonly_used_subkeys

And in the future, please add a source=ditagis tag so that it can easily be found which data was important.

49070017 over 7 years ago

Fixed, probably happened because of this issue

https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/14862

53908993 over 7 years ago

yes, thanks, it was fixed :)

53034294 almost 8 years ago

Ok thanks, I'll remove the construction tags there too

53034294 almost 8 years ago

Do you know if the road on the Chinese side is open as well?

53356053 almost 8 years ago

请不要删除现有的数据。你可以寻找帮助如果有些不清楚的事。

53358253 almost 8 years ago

下次你可以求人帮你回滚旧版。🙂

错误就是 https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53356053

53256559 almost 8 years ago

You deleted subway lines, but why?

52846834 almost 8 years ago

Should have been corrected now

53355968 almost 8 years ago

Next time, please do it for each province in a separate changeset so any possible mistakes could be reverted more easily.

52975534 almost 8 years ago

That's right. There's not that much harm, it just looks a little silly. (with overpass you can also search for place=village without a name tag: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/smK)
It's actually a problem of the renderer, a village with no name should be rendered with a dot for example.

Almost always when GNS only has a latin alphabet name, it's a 乡 or 镇 although it will be clear from the imagery that it's place=town anyways.

52975534 almost 8 years ago

I think it's better to avoid placeholder names like "村". Adding a node place=village without a name is sufficient, or draw a landuse=residential to render unnamed villages.
It could even be a nuisance later, if people use search tools to find places with missing names, the placeholder names will be missed.

52371956 almost 8 years ago

@Harald
reverted it
taxation=theft
obviously vandalism

52411926 almost 8 years ago

correct, i just fixed it, thanks for notifying me

52263087 almost 8 years ago

osm.org/way/414600778
你好
谢谢你的贡献!
你为什么把改这个道路从highway=unclassified为highway=road?
unclassified就是不重要的道路
road就是道路未知类型
osm.wiki/Highways#Roads_and_tracks

47949161 almost 8 years ago

The link should work, try to refresh it once.
You can view it directly as an image too if you want to verify my edits.

47949161 almost 8 years ago

I think this is the geoTIFF file i used for here, so you can start from the second guide right away
https://pan.baidu.com/s/1pLulZnH

47949161 almost 8 years ago

Use these 2 guides, it can be done in a few minutes once you have done it a few times before. I'm on holiday now otherwise I'd gladly do it for you.
osm.wiki/User:Ff5722/Using_Sentinel-2_imagery
osm.wiki/User:Ff5722/Using_local_tilesets_as_background_layer