OpenStreetMap
fgouget's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by fgouget
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4808577 | fgouget | Il manque un escalier. via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4808576 | fgouget | Il manque 2 autres escaliers. via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4808575 | fgouget | Il manque 2 escaliers. via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4808678 | fgouget | Il manque un escalier (et aussi un arbre vient de tomber !). via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4808679 | fgouget | Il manque un escalier (note peut-être en double, je ne vois pas.mes anciennes notes). L'escalier est en face de la caméra de surveillance qui se trouve sur le quai. via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4596395 | fgouget | In context of overlay "Street lighting" – Sidewalk – osm.org/way/1303507123 via StreetComplete 60.0: Il est étonnant que ce trottoir soit éclairé 24h/24. Si c'est bien le cas une note serait utile. |
|||
| 4285888 | fgouget | In context of overlay "Street lighting" – Foot Path – osm.org/way/1169743304 via StreetComplete 58.0: Ce way devrait être scindé afin de distinguer les passages piétons (footway=crossing + crossing=*) des trottoirs (footway=sidewalk). |
|||
| 4533606 | fgouget | In context of overlay "Street lighting" – Sidewalk – osm.org/way/1169792958 via StreetComplete 59.3: Probablement plutôt un passage piéton (footway=crossing + crossing=*). |
|||
| 4534517 | fgouget | In context of overlay "Street lighting" – Sidewalk – osm.org/way/1169742724 via StreetComplete 59.3: Ce trottoir devrait être scindé afin de distinguer les passages piétons (footway=crossing + crossing=*). |
|||
| 4561315 | fgouget | Unable to answer "Do the trees here have needles or leaves?" – Natural Wood – osm.org/way/996228047 via StreetComplete 60.0: Plus d'arbres. |
