OSM shouldn't be edited to fix how Kartographer renders.

It seems like either Q23287 actually matches to two objects in OSM (which would be pretty rare) or that the Wikidata tag should only be on one, in which case it's best to actually explain that in your edit.

I'm not from the UK so I don't know the nuances of ceremonial counties and which one would be valid, but if it's valid to be on two relations, then it should be on both and Kartographer needs to figure out how to handle that.

Hi, is this actually a track or is it just a driveway? If it's a driveway (even if it's dirt) it should be tagged as highway=service, service=driveway, and then you can pick an appropriate surface= tag (unpaved is a generic one that would cover it too)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148026581

Hi Evlyn, thanks for correctly tagging access instead of removing the tracks. If these tracks don't have names (which considering the unauthorised nature, is likely), then the name tag should be removed, not set to "No track".

Already went and fixed it up myself, but in future it would be good if the map builder team would act on feedback, especially if they are adding map builder edits on behalf of their users.

Hey and welcome to OSM! One tip, driveways generally don't extend into a house, you'd just want to put it where the driveway actually is and end it short of the house.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147932124

If you're uploading data into OSM, it's your responsibility to ensure it's correct.

Hi, is this definitely a residential road, or is it just a driveway for a subdivided property?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147913778

There's an osm@meta.com email address on their wiki page, osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Meta
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147837284

Is this definitely a house? Looking just south there's a building that looks more like a house, and from aerial imagery it could easily be a shed instead of a house.

Hi, I've removed all the individual parking areas bar the loading zone, there's already an amenity=parking way covering the whole parking lot, and that's how parking areas should be drawn (see osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking).

I've also tagged the loading area to signify this as well.

Yeah I'd have to agree with disused, and access=discouraged really, if NPWS actively starts removing the track/puts up signs clearly indicating access being forbidden, then the respective tags should change. Until there's no signs of a track on Bing/ESRI and on the ground, the way itself should remain to clearly indicate the current state.

Hi, phone=000 is incorrect for a number of reasons, not only is it not the wrong format, but it's also not the phone number for this specific location. See osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Triple_Zero for more info.

Hi, I don't think this actually qualifies as a service road, it would be a track if anything. I also suspect this imagery is out of date and that track may not exist anymore, I'll survey it soon and confirm.

There is lifecycle prefixes that can be used to show something has been removed, but keeps it in the database so that other mappers don't re-map it based on aerial imagery. osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

I'd suggest demolished, removed, or razed.

Hi there, are you able to let us know what was actually done in this change. Also, I'd recommend keeping your changes local, this spans several countries.

Hey, this doesn't need a multipolygon type, it's just a simple way. Multipolygons are when you use a relation to group two or more ways to represent one object.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147368462

Hey, this doesn't need a multipolygon type, it's just a simple way. Multipolygons are when you use a relation to group two or more ways to represent one object.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147368544

Hey Caleb, you've misspelled trunk and trunk_link as truck and truck_link on this edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147350920

Hey there, is the house actually named Lincoln 69? There's a tag addr:housename that's available, but it's also is unusual for houses to have both a number and name from what I've seen.

I'd also recommend using the Q keyboard shortcut in iD/JOSM to square off buildings where possible.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147281876

Just as an FYI, if you don’t check the actual objects you’re editing, that counts as mechanical.