fortera_au's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
150685084 | over 1 year ago | There's conflicting tagging of abandoned:highway=service and highway=service on this, is this still a current service road? If so, the abandoned:highway tag should be removed.
|
150685207 | over 1 year ago | Hi, surface=ground doesn't appear to be widely used, I'd suggest surface=unpaved if you know it's unpaved but aren't sure how.
|
150642441 | over 1 year ago | Hi, I've reverted this changeset because you've removed a segment of road that clearly exists. |
150341681 | over 1 year ago | Hi, this road is not an unclassified concrete road, and is also not drawn in a way that matches recent imagery. Can you please correct all of these issues? |
150204374 | over 1 year ago | Hi, as per another changeset comment, this road doesn't appear on the aerial imagery you've claimed to use, and is tagged incorrectly. Can you please confirm how you know this road exists? |
150203400 | over 1 year ago | Hi, not only is this tagged incorrectly, but this road doesn't exist on the aerial imagery you're claiming to have used, or newer imagery. Can you confirm how you know this road exists? |
150643500 | over 1 year ago | Hey there, way 1278041984 looks more like a service road than a track, do you know if it's paved at all?
|
150642530 | over 1 year ago | Hi, service roads should be highway=service, not highway=unclassified
|
150641373 | over 1 year ago | Also, most of the roads in the winery should probably be either service=parking_aisle or no service tag, service=driveway should only be for the ones leading up to one specific property/building, as per osm.wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway
|
150641373 | over 1 year ago | Hey there, the two larger vineyard areas you've added don't actually exist anymore, that's all housing now.
|
150336017 | over 1 year ago | The object you've added should only cover the outline of a building, not the whole property. |
150524249 | over 1 year ago | Hi, bus=yes isn't just used for bus routes. If this is a valid bus platform, it should include bus=yes to indicate what type of public transport uses it.
|
150518235 | over 1 year ago | Hey there, if this isn't a platform are you able to fix up the tagging indicating it as such? I'd double check to make sure that it's not used in any relations or that it's correctly replaced if so.
|
150519173 | over 1 year ago | Hi, bus=yes isn't just used for bus routes. If this is a valid bus platform, it should include bus=yes to indicate what type of public transport uses it.
|
150485566 | over 1 year ago | Hi, is this name currently signed on this location? If not, it should be removed and is more appropriate for OpenHistoricalMap
|
150482438 | over 1 year ago | Hi, is there actually a park here? I can't see anything on aerial imagery, and the shape is odd.
|
150476719 | over 1 year ago | Hi, just wondering if you got the name of the creek from a survey (on the ground) or another source?
|
150476139 | over 1 year ago | Hey, is this actually a park? It's an odd shape to be a park.
|
150473142 | over 1 year ago | Hi there, please try and keep changesets to a smaller area, this one crosses the whole world! |
150421286 | over 1 year ago | Hi JiafuYang, service roads should be tagged as highway=service, highway=unclassified is meant to be somewhat equivalent to highway=residential but for non-residential areas.
|