fortera_au's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
164230768 | 5 months ago | Hi, access=no means access in general is illegal. This is also a track, not a residential road.
|
164230586 | 5 months ago | Hi, you've removed this from being a road route, this has nothing to do with being a bike route.
|
164148896 | 5 months ago | Also just wondering, is Selgar Avenue Link Road signposted, DataSA's Roads dataset has it as just Selgar Link.
|
164192709 | 5 months ago | Hi, the new highway way here doesn't seem to match up to the imagery listed as used.
|
164148896 | 5 months ago | These are legitimate, there's a major public works project in this area.
|
164145846 | 5 months ago | Hey there, good work! I'd recommend pressing the Q button after drawing a building to square it off, and the only other recommendation would be that some of the buildings you've tagged as building=garage might be better off as building=shed (for example way 1371951932), if you're not sure whether it's one or the other you can just leave it as building=yes.
|
164126307 | 5 months ago | Hey, I'm not quite sure if this a building from the looks of it, it could possibly be a sun shade on a playground. Might be worth checking if there's any street level imagery you can use to confirm.
|
164126376 | 5 months ago | Hey, this should be highway=unclassified, it's the same level as residential but where the primary use isn't for access to housing.
|
163981873 | 5 months ago | For the parking area, the highway=service way should continue through the parking area, not end at the edges of it.
|
163977628 | 5 months ago | Hey, if you're not sure what the name is, you should delete the tag, not set it to unknown
|
163626547 | 5 months ago | Hi, just wondering what the source is for this and other similar edits? |
163463834 | 5 months ago | There's also a dragged node on w1111001526, probably easiest to revert the whole changeset. There's also no usage at all for that tag in AU, plus someone else has raised privacy concerns on another changeset.
|
163355454 | 6 months ago | Sometimes an edit like this is best done on a wide scale in a single changeset. It's been discussed, all the edits are related, and the discussion is linked. |
163279421 | 6 months ago | Hi, information from a council's Your Say page is generally copyrighted, meaning we can't use it. Are you able to either confirm this in person, or using another source? |
163309358 | 6 months ago | Thanks for that! The Wiki has some good resources in regards to allowable data sources, Australia has a list here: osm.wiki/Australian_Data_Sources and a global list is here: osm.wiki/Potential_datasources Still need to double check the licensing, you'll see in the AU list that there's some under CC-BY-SA which we normally can't use, but we've received a waiver from the data owner specifically allowing us to use it (we can't meet the attribution requirements as per the license, but often we'll get permission to have it listed elsewhere) |
163309358 | 6 months ago | Freely available doesn't mean compatible with the ODbL, which is required when using external data sources in OpenStreetMap as that's the license OSM itself is released under. |
163309884 | 6 months ago | You've added a tag as part of this changeset, addr:street=From. You'll either want to remove that, or update the address tags in general to reflect the new address. |
163309358 | 6 months ago | If you're not sure of the licensing right now, it might be best to consider reverting this changeset, unless you're able to find some source with all of these details. |
163309358 | 6 months ago | Hi, are those sources available under an open license? Having a look at metar-taf.com, there isn't any mention of a license, which means it would be copyrighted and unsuitable for use in OpenStreetMap.
|
163309884 | 6 months ago | Hi, you've set the street address to just "From"
|