fortera_au's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
153503763 | about 1 year ago | Hi, roundabouts should not have names unless the roundabout itself specifically has a name.
|
153503693 | about 1 year ago | Hi, is this road actually called/signed as Munno Para Boulevard? It shouldn't carry the name just because it spurs off from it.
|
152922212 | about 1 year ago | Hi there, access=no means nobody is allowed there. If this is private property, access=private or potentially access=customers (if appropriate) would probably be better suited.
|
152532258 | about 1 year ago | This isn't the location of Rydges Pit Lane, and it's already mapped in the correct location. I've removed this as a result.
|
152563508 | about 1 year ago | This is clearly a pool and not a pond.
|
152519314 | about 1 year ago | Are these all signed with the name "Paraglider launch", or is that just a descriptive name that should be removed/moved to description? |
152357076 | about 1 year ago | If it's private it should be access=private, not acecss=no.
|
151920377 | about 1 year ago | Hi, Google Maps isn't allowed as a source, was this verified using any other source/in person?
|
151920395 | about 1 year ago | Hi, Google Maps isn't allowed as a source, was this verified using any other source/in person?
|
152183270 | about 1 year ago | Hey, pretty sure these crossings aren't uncontrolled since there'd be signals there at the traffic lights.
|
150947514 | about 1 year ago | Hi imccredie, I've reviewed these all, and they were tagged correctly. If your data consumer is treating these as routes, there is an issue with the data consumer as they are all tagged as platforms with area=yes as well. |
150645721 | about 1 year ago | Hi imccredie, I've reviewed these all, and they were tagged correctly. If your data consumer is treating these as routes, there is an issue with the data consumer as they are all tagged as platforms with area=yes as well. |
150643199 | about 1 year ago | Hi imccredie, I've reviewed these all, and they were tagged correctly. If your data consumer is treating these as routes, there is an issue with the data consumer as they are all tagged as platforms with area=yes as well. |
150524249 | about 1 year ago | Hi imccredie, I've reviewed these all, and they were tagged correctly. If your data consumer is treating these as routes, there is an issue with the data consumer as they are all tagged as platforms with area=yes as well. |
150519173 | about 1 year ago | Hi imccredie, I've reviewed these all, and they were tagged correctly. If your data consumer is treating these as routes, there is an issue with the data consumer as they are all tagged as platforms with area=yes as well. |
151560311 | over 1 year ago | It actually looks like you've moved that node too, so I've moved it back.
|
151560311 | over 1 year ago | It looks like you've managed to accidentally make n3759965257 part of w169331951 (South Terrace). I've fixed this up already for you, just an FYI.
|
151490438 | over 1 year ago | Hi, descriptive names like this shouldn't be used.
|
151082214 | over 1 year ago | I've removed the small untagged way added in Australia in this edit. |
151041093 | over 1 year ago | Reverted fictional edit |