Hi, can you please explain why these roads have changed from residential to trunk?

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

Thanks for confirming, I couldn't see any evidence of construction on several spot checked sections in Bing imagery, please make sure you include the correct sources when you make edits.

For the details that aren't able to be determined from aerial imagery (i.e. name), can you let me know the source for that?

Reverted by DWG

osm.org/changeset/167813842

Reverted by DWG

osm.org/changeset/167813842

Reverted by DWG

osm.org/changeset/167813842

Reverted by DWG

osm.org/changeset/167813842

Reverted by DWG

osm.org/changeset/167813842

Reverted by DWG

osm.org/changeset/167813842

Reverted by DWG

osm.org/changeset/167813842

Reverted by DWG

osm.org/changeset/167813842

Reverted by DWG

osm.org/changeset/167813842

It's still "officially" part of the standard, but it's being ignored more and more at least.

I'd be in favour of changing the name back to its previous one, or another name from GTFS if preferred.

That name follows the PTv2 name format, however that's been widely discussed/disputed. I've generally ignored that format and use whatever name is actually used in either GTFS or on vehicles themselves.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167774788

Hi there, is the dog park going to be rebuilt with the same name? If so, a lifecycle prefix might be best, maybe construction:leisure=dog_park

osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167761070

4212 is significantly closer to Brisbane, this definitely seems incorrect.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167718089

Does North Toowoomba East actually exist? I can find North Toowoomba and East Toowoomba, but nothing combining the two of them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167720870

Hi there, osm.wiki/Tag:club%3Dsport might be a more appropriate tag for this
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167717852

Sorry, forgot to add:

Thanks,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

(translated via LibreTranslate)

嗨,你把Bing列为线人 但Bing没有显示正在建设的高速公路 你能告诉我这是什么来源吗?

谢谢
安德鲁·韦尔奇,OSMF 数据工作组

Hi, you've listed Bing as a source, however Bing doesn't show that motorway under construction. Can you let me know what the source for this is?

Hi, greens shouldn't be mapped inside of fairway/rough ways, the fairway/rough should be mapped as a multipolygon, with anything inside of it marked as an inner of that multipolygon. How this is currently mapped says that the green is also the rough, which is obviously wrong. You've also done the same thing with sand traps, these should be inners of a multipolygon relationship if they're entirely surrounded by a fairway/rough.