This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 169475883, 169475889, 169475892, 169475898, 169475900, 169475906, 169475910, 169475917, 169475922, 169475928, 169476160.

This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 169475883, 169475889, 169475892, 169475898, 169475900, 169475906, 169475910, 169475917, 169475922, 169475928, 169476160.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169479602, 169479590, 169479583, 169479592, 169479595, 169479580, 169479608, 169479613, 169479589, 169479600, 169479597 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: unauthorised import

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169479602, 169479590, 169479583, 169479592, 169479595, 169479580, 169479608, 169479613, 169479589, 169479600, 169479597 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: unauthorised import

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169479602, 169479590, 169479583, 169479592, 169479595, 169479580, 169479608, 169479613, 169479589, 169479600, 169479597 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: unauthorised import

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169479602, 169479590, 169479583, 169479592, 169479595, 169479580, 169479608, 169479613, 169479589, 169479600, 169479597 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: unauthorised import

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169479602, 169479590, 169479583, 169479592, 169479595, 169479580, 169479608, 169479613, 169479589, 169479600, 169479597 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: unauthorised import

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169479602, 169479590, 169479583, 169479592, 169479595, 169479580, 169479608, 169479613, 169479589, 169479600, 169479597 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: unauthorised import

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169479602, 169479590, 169479583, 169479592, 169479595, 169479580, 169479608, 169479613, 169479589, 169479600, 169479597 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: unauthorised import

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169479602, 169479590, 169479583, 169479592, 169479595, 169479580, 169479608, 169479613, 169479589, 169479600, 169479597 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: unauthorised import

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169479602, 169479590, 169479583, 169479592, 169479595, 169479580, 169479608, 169479613, 169479589, 169479600, 169479597 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: unauthorised import

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169479602, 169479590, 169479583, 169479592, 169479595, 169479580, 169479608, 169479613, 169479589, 169479600, 169479597 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: unauthorised import

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169479602, 169479590, 169479583, 169479592, 169479595, 169479580, 169479608, 169479613, 169479589, 169479600, 169479597 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: unauthorised import

Hi, what's the source for this, is there any website or anything else to confirm this location? office=it also seems odd for a house, is this somewhere you can just drop into in person?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169258388

Hi Krillo74,

You only mentioned the changeset ID that we're currently commenting on, not a specific item that was edited.

The edit that TheSwavu made is valid. As mentioned, the addr:suburb, addr:postcode and addr:state tagging is redundant in Australia as data consumers will use boundaries to determine suburbs, postcodes and states when needed.

Hi Krillo74,

In Australia, suburbs and postcodes are generally provided through administative boundary relations, like this one: osm.org/relation/2386808

This makes tagging addr:postcode, addr:suburb, addr:state and addr:country redundant, and often is removed by mappers in Australia.

The changeset description that TheSwavu used was probably not the clearest, and was likely talking about removing redundant tagging, not that the postcode is incorrect.

If you're asking other mappers about changes, it's best to be more specific about what you're talking about. If you're addressing all the objects changed in a changeset, I'd specify that, because your comment could come across as talking about a specific item without saying which one.

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

These aren't parking aisles, they're waiting lanes for getting on the ferry.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169102932

Since this seems to be in the complete wrong location, I've just removed all tags from this node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169134105

This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 167636785, 167640945, 167647408, 167649913, 167650289, 167652602, 167653368, 167654262, 167660246, 167661012, 167661051, 167661130, 167677392, 167678071, 167678731, 167680221, 167680249, 167685613, 167707889, 167708369, 167714760, 167776918, 167899666, 167900243, 167907563, 167915660, 167916053, 167919256, 167920326, 167921751, 167922086, 167923309, 167925083, 167925891, 167927025, 167928951, 167928959.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168963114 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incorrect source, no valid source provided