Thank you! I think it's all right now. Have a nice day.

Hello. I think that numbers of platforms should be in `ref` tag rather than `name` tag. osm.wiki/DE:Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform

> adding the same Wikidata tag on all of them

Wikidata should only be inserted for an entity that exactly matches. I don't think it is good idea put the same wikidata id to 3 parts of mountain range. There would have to be partial records on the wikidata for each of the three parts.

The best solution would be to have multipolygon for the whole mountain_range and other polygons (ways or relations) for the parts with different wikidata. But if we are not able to make the polygon precise engouh (we don't know boundaries od geomorphological units) it is better to have a node in the data than not to have an entity at all. I am convinced that this is so - people from whole world can find the approximate location of it at least.

Hello. Why did you deleted the node for mountain range Cordillera de la Costa osm.org/node/5653713128/history ? Was it on wrong place? It is no problem to have mountain range as node if cannot make exact polygon. I'd like to put it back.

Hi. I think that relation for Δήμος Κεφαλληνίας osm.org/relation/2211891 is no more valid. I think it was divided to 3 smaller municipalities in 2019. But I'm not Greek and I don't have local knowledge to put it correct. Could you adjust the admin_level=7 boundaries?

It's just label position. Industrial zone is part of the city. Feel free to move it to a more representative position, if you want.

Hi. I don't think so. It has different admin level (7 vs. 8).

Zdravím. Je to už půl roku, ale skoro jistě byl zdroj ZBGIS a asi jsem to omylem nenapsal do zdrojů, to se omlouvám.

Upraveno, díky.

Na místě jsem nebyl, ale vím o ní. Není žádné tajemství že tam je :-)

Co se týče doplnění názvu, inspiroval jsem se u podobných nabíjecích stanic v Rakousku osm.org/node/5473777157 , kde je název také uveden v name.

Nejsem si jist, nakolik, je vaše připomínka oprávněná. U běžných čerpacích stanic se také uvádí v poli name např. "OMV" - třeba zde to je u stanice, kterou jste editoval osobně osm.org/node/245241018#map=19/48.13180/17.11957 .

Takže si myslím, že použití "name" není chyba, jak tvrdíte. Možná v něm spíš mělo být "Bratislava Supercharger", podobně jako je tady "Zvolen Supercharger" osm.org/node/3945274091 . Tak je uváděn i na webových stránkách Tesly https://www.tesla.com/cs_CZ/findus/location/supercharger/bratislavasupercharger . Upravím takto.

Hi. I noticed you use tags natural=water for sea realtions. I think there should be only place=sea and not natural=water. This could cause some rendering problems.

User of our Mapy.cz application reported this, but was not able to change it himself. It seemed trustworthy.

Great, thank you for making relation.
I just wanted to add info about UNESCO heritage to some entity and I hadn't found any proper one. So I had to create it.
Now, I've deleted the duplicite node I'd created yesterday.

Why do you use areas for place tags and not nodes? Most of places names are nodes in OSM data. Name of this village is not visible even on openstreedmap.org. And many other map renderers also don't display this name of village (and other villages).