Personally I would have just omitted the addr:city tag as most roads don't have it anyway. Victoria Plains is an old settlement that no longer exists. That area is in the RM of Sherwood, not within City of Regina border. Also Saskatchewan is spelled incorrectly.

A lot of the water that is on the satellite imagery for this area is intermittent at best, and after 2 very dry years is mostly gone. There are large scale ongoing drainage projects SW of Regina that should prevent much of the water from ever returning.

That does not exist.

I see Victoria Plains is in the NRC Canvec dataset as a place=locality which would be a more suitable tag. OSM wiki indicates it is for former settlements where none of the structures remain. That way they wouldn't be given the same labeling prominence on the map as currently occupied suburbs.

What's up with the suburb names in places with no suburbs?

That road was barricaded when Parliament Avenue was extended. It will likely be removed in the near future as more apartment buildings are constructed.

Nope, those links aren't open. Due to traffic flow concerns between Eastgate and Victoria Avenue those have been barricaded since they were built 2 years ago and won't open until Eastgate is moved north, work that hasn't even started.

I drove by there this morning on the way to Emerald Park and there are no traffic lights.

Are there traffic lights at Victoria and Tower road now? There weren't any the last time I was out there a month ago.

What are you basing that railway avenue edit on? The imagery doesn't support it, and last time I was in Pilot Butte there was no such road, plus you have it cutting through 2 other roads.

Maybe footway or path with surface=grass so at least gps / navigation sites don't route cars down them.

Those aren't alleys, just utility easements. I wouldn't even consider them paths.

That extension you made to Dewdney Ave in Regina hasn't existed in about 4 years. Its not even in the satellite imagery. The map the TCT website uses is horribly out of date, so at least check the imagery before copying something from it into OSM.

Duplicating the park name in the park features is rather redundant.

That back alley isn't part of Cameron Crescent. The following map should be considered an official reference, not Google: http://www.regina.ca/visitors/parks/find-field-park/regina-parks-map/

Those edits were ages ago.

My bad. I've never used the mailing lists before. I'll sign up and post a detailed account of the methodology used, source of data, etc so at the very least there is a record.

It is inappropriate delete existing roads and draw your own bike routes on the map. For something of that nature use a route planner such as RideWithGPS or MapMyRide.

I noticed in Maple Ridge some of the houses you added aren't in any of the available satellite imagery. It looks like your data source is the same as is used by http://opengis.regina.ca/parksmap/ . The building shape data may be owned by ISC, at least that was what was indicated to me when I requested that data from the City of Regina. So you should double check that you are indeed permitted to upload it to OSM. Last time I looked, ISC had fairly restrictive terms for the data they make available for public viewing.

Neat. Where did you find the building shapes? City of Regina's website only has addresses. If you are drawing them all by hand, that is amazing.