OpenStreetMap 标志 OpenStreetMap

变更集 时间 评论
169897565 3日前

Every college will have bars and canteens, same for schools, hospitals, factories and other workplaces. Personally, I don't think they should be mapped. They are internal parts to the broader element which is already mapped, and they have no public use. I think it adds confusion for map users, more than clarity. Not everything with FHRS needs to be represented on OSM.

169878686 4日前

I think they should be tagged as removed:* and disused:*.
Bus stops are quite prominent in the rendered map, so keeping them as normal seems a bit misleading, if they are gone.

168967135 22日前

I have always seen it referred to with the article.

As for capitalisation, I capitalised the first word taking the two as a unit "The airline", but now I also see that sometimes they write "The Airline" on some of their pages and social media, so I'd be fine with that.

168530927 约1个月前

Certainly, thank you. I have opened this note osm.org/note/4839913 to list a few others that I saw that need updating.

168526701 约1个月前

Yes, please do add everything else you feel is needed. I am not entirely familiar with all bus route tags. Thanks.

168442705 约1个月前

The two have completely different meanings (as the wiki page shows). Here, a permit is required at those times (which means that access is *not* permissive).

168442705 约1个月前

Hi, thanks for the space correction, however permit was correct, not permissive.

167839215 约2个月前

For the other cases, it makes sense, since there are probably other things on upper floors of the same building.

167839215 约2个月前

Hello.

I think the Covered Market units should not be tagged as buildings, and there is no reason to map the shops as a separate nodes, when the current polygons already provide more information and more accurate mapping.

167746211 约2个月前

Hello. Are there any restaurant premises at this address? If not, I think it should be tagged as craft=caterer, not amenity=restaurant.

osm.wiki/Tag:craft=caterer

Thanks.

167372940 约2个月前

Same comment here as here: osm.org/changeset/167373137#map=18/51.753797/-1.260346&layers=N

I can revert those deletions, if you want. Can you confirm whether those places are all vacant? Or have they been replaced?

Thank you.

167373137 约2个月前

Hello.
Please do not delete nodes, if the physical place is still there. If the shop or restaurant is gone, it can be tagged as vacant or disused (see the wiki). That makes updating much easier and preserves the history.

167339670 约2个月前

If both are still present, then we need two separate nodes.

167339670 约2个月前

This Fusion Arts is in Gloucester Green.
If it has relocated to Park End Street, then the old node should be updated (as vacant or new occupier) and a new one created in the new location.

167339670 约2个月前

Also, the one you linked is not here.

167339670 约2个月前

Hi. Points of interest and amenities mapped as independent nodes located inside a building object should not have a building tag.

167194392 2个月前

Hello. I had reverted your previous changeset, based on my comment here: osm.org/changeset/167137992
Let me know if you think it makes sense. Thanks.

167137992 2个月前

Hi. Oxford is already the main "name" tag, so this doesn't add anything. I suppose the previous short_name could have been helpful in some searches which are able to take the area into account (Railway Station, Oxford).

165940758 3个月前

Hi. The church was demolished more than a century ago. The surviving tower is not a place of worship.

164639848 4个月前

Hi. Welcome to OSM! And thanks for your contribution.

When uploading a changeset, please use the comment description to inform others on what you did. Writing "hi" is not helpful.

For more information, please see: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
The wiki contains other helpful pages for a new mapper.

Thanks. Best wishes.