There are two copies of E. Chestnut on top of each other. Seems this is the last edit but unsure when the overlap was created, could you take a look?

Not sure who caused this issue, but there is an overlapping road here and you were a recent editor of this road, if you could fix it that would be great. The problem area is at (39.50248,-74.99426) near the service road. If you don't understand the problem, feel free to please contact me.

It looks like osm.org/user/Oksana%20Chubatenko is touching the same areas that the old Daria_something was touching... something strange is going on here. Confused here.

It's 5PM here now, where are the nodes?

I just saw this and thanks for the revert of the deleted business nodes, though duplicates showed up. I'd like to mention I ended up manually deleting the (other?) duplicates, hopefully the current state is accurate (specifically the Greeley,CO nodes.)

I guess my main reason for making the distinction is I'd like the map to stand on its own if suddenly all the parking aisles were deleted from the map. What troubles me is there would be a lot of dangling roads now if parking aisles were removed, and IMHO this should not be the case! The main reason why I've been editing OSM is for trying to get maps working on standalone devices and one of the "optimizations" I've wanted is to keep file sizes small - and these parking aisles is one thing that seemed like a good compromise, except when it causes dangling roads when they get removed. I suspect an algorithm could be made to remove some of these too, but I figured it'd look better anyway if "minor" roads like parking aisles were drawn thinner.

Thanks for the revert.

It was just incidental that I saw this road in the first place - I tried using the routing tools and it drove me over this road which I knew was incorrect because I have local knowledge. It got fixed, hopefully before anyone crashed into the lift gates on the road that prohibits regular traffic. Or even worse, had a head on collision!

But yes these are regular buses that will, except at these specific stops with the shelter in the island, drive on right everywhere else. Hence is why it looks very weird here. Don't worry about it too much, I can't blame anyone for not knowing, pretty much have to be local and carefully study mass transit to know this oddity!

Believe me, I was staring hard at this and other bus stops along the MAX Guideway, but it indeed is correct the way it was before. This is because the door on the bus is on the right, and TransFort wanted to save money and build just one shelter so they had to share it in the middle island.

The MAX Guideway is not open to regular traffic so it will not cause traffic problems.

This change should be reverted.

Cool, thanks for updating. I just think it looks a bit better when roads that aren't used for getting from point A to point B (like if A or B is just a one car parking spot) should be a thin road that can be easily dropped when zoomed out without needing some algorithm to guess.

Might be better to use "Parking Aisle" instead of "Service Road" where the road doesn't really lead anywhere except to a row of parking spots, at least that's what I'd do.

Whoops, bad changeset comment, I meant to write just under 2MW total...

These donation/sales centers are https://www.arcthrift.com/ -- so I tried to stick with this.

I may have made a non PC statement by spelling out what I think was the actual original acronym, but it's still the charity's focus and their proceeds goes to helping out developmentally challenged children.

I knew Sports Authority was around here but they closed a few years ago, how are you sourcing this information? I do recall driving by here maybe 2 years ago and believe TJ Maxx was at the end of the row of buildings, so something doesn't seem right here.

Sorry, I clicked the save button too fast, meant to replace the changelog with "add markers for Drake Center building" but left the old changelog description for the previous edit I made. Oops!

thanks for the concern, yeah I just saw this...still trying to digest and understand all these new concepts.

Sorry, didn't want to imply it was incorrect in any way, I'm still trying to learn what the correct way to do this is. After futzing with this a bit I was finally able to get it to render properly or at least it looked the way that I was expecting it to look (has "Post Office" and either "Boardwalk" or "South" Fort Collins), except OSM Inspector apparently flags a warning. Definitely should fix the warning too, but I'm still baffled at how this should be done such that the label is correct plus satisfies all QA checks.

When I looked at it last night, there seemed to be a multipolygons outer, multipolygon building, and a rectangular inner area. After the outer was marked with a new name, the renderer picked that name partially to print on the website) - even worse last night I saw it half the building name and half the outer name.

So this may be related to the weird render observations I've seen with this building, so being the newbie I am, would like to get to understand this, thanks for any suggestions!

A bit of naming concern here, what should be outer/inner/main be named for this post office? Apparently the renderer is now starting to put the "outer" name which should be an "internal" name? Would like to understand more about how these inner-outer relationships should be used...

No problem, this strip of businesses looked a little neglected while driving past it on 287, but indeed still lively with business coming in and out! (at least if it must change, not all out...)

Doh. Wish it were easier to tell when each photo was taken. Thanks.