Please also add a description to each of your edits.

Please add a description to your edits when you make them, which briefly mentions what you’ve changed. This allows others to browse through the edits without having to look at all of them in turn.

This edit is incorrect. landuse=residential is for tagging the area of a settlement, not for tagging a row of terraced houses. You’ve tagged the entire area around the church as a building, whereas the church is only one part of that.

Please also add a description to each of your edits so others can easily see what your intent was when making the edit.

Nice!

Is that car park for The Grey Walls? If so, you could add operator=The Grey Walls to make it clearer who the ‘customers’ are.

OK. I’ve added osm.org/note/1264507 so we don’t forget about it.

Ah, I suspect some of it is still Manna House. I didn’t know about Manna House before; I’ve been to the pub, and the public part of it certainly doesn’t occupy all of the mapped building, but I didn’t know how far the private part of it extends. If you have surveyed/seen Manna House, do you want to split the building and update the map?

Hah, very good. Count me out though; I found it hard enough to work out where the cut-and-cover line of the pipeline was from the satellite imagery when I could see where the aqueduct bridges were!

Hah, was this prompted by my Thirlmere aqueduct edit? I wasn’t expecting that. Nice one. :-)

Consider tagging these using the Public Transport Schema v2, rather than just v1: osm.wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform

Fixed in osm.org/changeset/55107351.

I was on the fence about the surgery building; it was geometrically simpler to include, but in hindsight probably more incorrect than correct. I’ll remove it.

I included the railway corridor to the NW so that there isn’t a gap. An alternative would be to lengthen the railway corridor itself. Again, I was on the fence about this. Maybe I’ll change it, since having the station the same length as the car park to the north kind of suggests that the car park is something to do with the station (which it isn’t).

The browser does indeed fill in the last changeset message, but it’s easy enough to take a few seconds to look over the fields above the ‘Upload’ button in iD before pressing the button. You could also, for example, fill in the hashtags and sources fields to provide more information about your changes. We all make mistakes, but we can all also try and find ways of making sure those mistakes don’t happen again. :-)

Similarly to changeset #54543256, please make sure that your changeset messages reflect what actually changed; and phone numbers should use the country code and be formatted in three groups.

Hi, this looks like a good update, but please make sure that your changeset message reflects what actually changed in the changeset. Adding the phone number and website to a pub isn’t a rural update!

Also, note that phone numbers should generally be formatted as `+44 1524 844451` so that consumers of OSM data don’t need to deal with too many different phone number formats.

Thanks!

(Thanks for these updates!)

The footpath link from Sunnyside to the canal is a flight of steps, isn’t it? If so, they should be tagged as such. osm.wiki/Tag:highway=steps

Reverted as changeset: osm.org/edit?changeset=54442513

I’ve reverted this in osm.org/changeset/54456404.

Do you know if this new road has street lighting (lit=yes/no), and which side it has pavements on (sidewalk=both/left/right)? Is it tarmac (surface=asphalt)?