Hi, me again. Why have you deleted High Man (osm.org/node/5641737977/history)? Again, it’s visible on the OS OpenData StreetView data, so the name obviously means something (either a locality, fellside, or peak) and should be represented on the map. Ta

Heya, thanks for updating this construction site in Stainton. You deleted one house (osm.org/way/1187864290) — was that intentional? The foundations are clearly visible in aerial imagery from when it was a construction site, and it seems unlikely that the builders would have built the foundations then not gone on to build a house on top. But it’s possible.

If so, I’ll re-add the area and explicitly tag it as ‘not constructed’ so that other editors don’t unintentionally re-add it from aerial imagery in future.

Ta

Thanks for clarifying. You accidentally deleted the pier in your edit, so I’ve added it back in osm.org/changeset/162251937. Let me know if anything looks wrong with what I’ve done :)

Hiya, thanks for your recent edits locally, it’s nice to see new local contributors :)

I’ve removed the name from this particular section of footpath as it’s actually already correctly part of a ‘relation’ which describes the whole West Windermere Route.

Relations allow for walking/riding/cycling routes to be described in more detail, and deal with the problem where one section of path can be part of multiple routes — if this was done by naming the path, how would a path which is both on the Pennine Way and Pennine Bridleway be named?

There’s some more information about routes here: osm.wiki/Walking_Routes

And here are the full WWW route relations, if you’re interested:
- osm.org/relation/16216506
- osm.org/relation/16216507
- osm.org/relation/16216508

Happy to answer any questions if you have them :)

(Partial revert in osm.org/changeset/162251640)

(If you want a hand with this, or have questions, I’m happy to help!)

Has the Bike Barn Pier been demolished, or is it still physically present (but unused)?

and, if so, that section of cycle lane should be tagged as a bridge, like the road is.

It’s been a few months since I was last there, but doesn’t that service road run under the bridge, and the cycle lane is on top of the bridge? If so, they shouldn’t be connected.

Reverted (as osm.org/changeset/162244615) for the same reasons as in osm.org/changeset/162242922 — see discussion there

Hiya, thanks for your edits around the Dales recently. I’ve reverted this change because the access tagging for this bridleway was already correct, and your changes broke vehicle access to Gunnerfleet Farm.

Bridleways are a right of way, and don’t necessarily describe the physical appearance of the route. The tagging to indicate a bridleway is designation=public_bridleway horse=designated. In this case, the physical appearance of the way is as a compacted gravel track, with private vehicular access to the farm.

highway=bridleway is a bit of a distraction and generally only makes sense to use when going across fields, with no vehicular access (a bit like highway=footway is used).

See osm.wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#Public_bridleways for more information on tagging them.

Thanks! Happy to answer any questions if you have them.

Reverted as osm.org/changeset/162244290

This edit covers most of the length of the UK, and is therefore quite hard for other editors to review. Please make your edits smaller in future, thanks: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

👍

Heya, you’ve changed the name of osm.org/node/11288138877 quite significantly, from ‘Great Slack’ to ‘Seathwaite Fell South Top’. Are you sure this is correct? Great Slack is shown on the OS maps and should be mapped as some kind of feature in the area (even if it’s not the name of the summit). As I understand it, the names on DoBIH are not necessarily historically researched, and are often constructed by whoever listed the hill. They’re not particularly canonical.

A nice improvement, good work :D

Thanks

Thanks

There is no prominence distinction between natural=peak and natural=hill, but natural=hill does no harm here so I’ve changed it in osm.org/changeset/161701761

Heya, should Hartrigg be a hamlet (osm.org/node/12523533576)? It’s the farm there, so I’m not sure it’s correct for it also to be a hamlet.

Why change Badger Rock (osm.org/way/507498775) from natural=boulder to natural=bare_rock? It’s a single boulder, so I suggest natural=stone would be the most appropriate tag (see osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Dstone).

Hiya, I’m not sure this change does what you intended: the note on the way says “pass is open to vehicles and horses with permits for one day per month.”. You removed the access=permit tagging (which sets the default access for all modes) and added motor_vehicle=permit, but didn’t add horse=permit. So now the horse access tagging is unspecified.

I think setting the default using access=permit was a bit more robust than specifying the same for each mode of transport.