Please don't draw buildings over already existing buildings!

Please square your buildings, it help much more!

Please square your buildings, it helps much more...

Really, triangular buildings?

It would be nice if you square the buildings you draw...

Please don't munge several buildings into one. And draw the buildings as squared rectangles. Like this it doesn't really help...

Please draw square the buildings!

Please draw the buildings only once.

Please draw square buildings, like this it doesn't really help...

Could you please 'square' the buildings?
Here's a help page on how to do this: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

I mean not drawing the buildings *over* the streets, for example like these two: osm.org/way/651395758/history and
osm.org/way/651395755/history

Could you please not draw the buildings over the streets that are already there?

Could you please square the buildings for the next time?

Please do square the buildings as described in the instructions: https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/5507?task=200

Der Bücherturm ist schon da: osm.org/node/5744406138

Please add the 'building' tag to drawn buildings, and don't just draw them as area...

Please do square the buildings, they should not be this skewed...

Ciao This
Auf der talk-ch-Mailing-Liste wurde vor längerem mal diskutiert: Hydranten-Nummern sollten mit 'ref=Nummer' und nicht mit 'name=Nummer' erfasst werden :)
Gruss,
Habi

In my opinion all the buildings should be tagged as 'building=yes' instead of 'landuse=residential'. I changed most of them.

And also because there's a nice tree visible on the satellite imagery :)