habi's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
67263819	almost 5 years ago	Ciao Marc You've added a PV installation (osm.org/node/6268577559) with this changeset. I don't see it on the 'Bern 2016' imagery, did you survey it yourself on the roof? I came here because of https://maproulette.org/challenge/4030/task/14114473
90926429	almost 5 years ago	Äh! Nicht 'STA ist weg', das war der letzte Changeset-Kommentar aufm Handy, sondern 'Hier hat's einen Defibrillator' :)
89713488	almost 5 years ago	Ciao Der STA-Laden in Bern ist bis auf ein paar Pulte und ein Drucker leer. Ich fände eine Markierung mit 'disused:shop=travel_agent' besser als 'opening_hours=closed', so a la osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Key:disused: Den Laden in Bern habe ich schon mal so markiert: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90924388 Fingsch guet, wenn ich die anderen Shops auch so markiere?
90756768	almost 5 years ago	Ciao Auch hier; Bing ist etwas verschoben gegenüber der Realität. Ich heb den Fussweg und das von dir eingezeichnete Gebäude an die amtliche Vermessung angepasst: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90759903
90756347	almost 5 years ago	Hallo und willkommen bei OSM. Das Gebäude ist laut 'amtlicher Vermessung Kanton Bern' genauso wie es seit Jahren eingezeichnet war. Anhand 'Bing' eingezeichnet ist das Dach dabei, also zu gross... Ich habe das Gebäude wieder an die Vermessung angeglichen: osm.org/changeset/90759756
88470292	almost 5 years ago	Please don't name buildings with their features, you could have added 'roof:colour=blue' in this case.
90152221	almost 5 years ago	So it was not you who added that name?
90542483	almost 5 years ago	You have drawn a lot of buildings over already present ones, especially ones that you already traced. Please don't do that!
90542896	almost 5 years ago	You have drawn a lot of buildings over already present ones. Please don't do that!
90532683	almost 5 years ago	Sorry for the large bounding box, I 'missed' some changes from HOTOSM still lingering in JOSM...
89401902	almost 5 years ago	You've drawn a lot of buildings over already present ones. Please refrain from doing so.
88469537	almost 5 years ago	There's no need to add 'name=building' to buildings you draw (or name='dirt road' to highways). Tagging them as 'building=yes'/'highway=track' is sufficient. Happy mapping!
90152221	almost 5 years ago	You should not add 'name=building' to buildings. Tagging them as 'building=yes' is sufficient.
88470720	almost 5 years ago	You should not add 'name=building' to buildings. Tagging them as 'building=yes' is sufficient.
89215516	almost 5 years ago	Hey! You've requested a review in this changeset, here it is: It would be good if you 'square' the buildings you draw by pressing the Q key on your keyboard after drawing the building. Happy mapping!
90163401	almost 5 years ago	Reviewing change sets spanning Romania and Canada is very cumbersome. It would be good if you can keep the changes confined to a small geographic region.
89977462	almost 5 years ago	And also deleted the way making out this building: osm.org/way/838613608, it's only the four nodes at the edges...
89977462	almost 5 years ago	Hey! You deleted osm.org/way/837441849 in this changeset. For me (in JOSM) it now shows up as a bunch of unconnected nodes. Can you put it back on the map?
89324467	about 5 years ago	Please don't add descriptive names to the things you are tracing. 'building=yes' is sufficient, 'name=building' is superfluous. Happy mapping!
89375517	about 5 years ago	Please don't add descriptive names to the things you are tracing. 'building=yes' is sufficient, 'name=cognizant' is unnecessary! Happy mapping!