ianc's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
117286568 | over 3 years ago | Actually I've jus noted that this is this bridge shouldn't be there - a 10 year old error! I'll do a proper fix. The RoW are a bit weird here. |
117286568 | over 3 years ago | Oh, sorry - that was me accidentally jogging the alignment of a little footbridge when I was sorting out FP 001. Good spot |
116473053 | over 3 years ago | What I did was a cludge made necessary by the the Public Rights Of Way would not render properly in a QGIS project. A map that does render properly is pretty useless. Luckily my local community, for whom I did this work, have already befitted from it. |
59276272 | about 6 years ago | Cheers. Don't really remember this site, but I did go through a phase of being impatient with large things not rendering and just getting the "It's not the map, it's the data that matters" bollocks back. Tell that those who use the map, including Olney Tesco. I see stiles and kissing gates are finally rendering... |
59276272 | about 6 years ago | Interesting point, but since the map gives a different set of features to the editor I'm finding it tricky to investigate. The editor says, behind some multi-polygon complexity that it is landuse=palent_nursery. |
62187781 | almost 7 years ago | Hmmm. Not sure how that happened. I think it may be that some of them are BOATs rather than just public footpaths or bridleways and Go Map didn't handle it very elegantly. Shall check when I get a mo. |
59959267 | almost 7 years ago | Cool - thanks. Nice to see someone else looking at the area! |