iandees's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
144083593 | almost 2 years ago | Thanks for contribution! Your edits look great. Keep up the good work.
|
143086270 | almost 2 years ago | Same thing here. This is County Road E, not County Road East.
|
143086601 | almost 2 years ago | Thanks for working on expanding road names, but please be careful to not expand roads that are named with letters, like "E Street" in this changeset.
|
75352693 | almost 2 years ago | Did you happen to make any other tests that we should remove? |
140301466 | about 2 years ago | I'm curious: why did you split W 20th St into a bunch of smaller ways?
|
751242 | about 2 years ago | Thanks for sharing. Please feel free to change it. |
139808955 | about 2 years ago | Note that minor roads in industrial areas should not be tagged as tertiary. Tertiary is meant for roads that link populated areas together (osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary). The ones you changed should likely remain "unclassified".
|
139053888 | about 2 years ago | Hello, can you please share where you got the name for this way? osm.org/way/836809199. Exit ramps don't normally have names and especially don't have names like that. |
136833571 | about 2 years ago | Please stop deleting service roads. That is useful information.
|
136767376 | about 2 years ago | It's great to see that you're improving the data. Please try to use actual OpenStreetMap tags, though. "Category" is not a valid tag. If you want to work with us to figure out how to tag garage door shops, please let us know!
|
136540548 | over 2 years ago | Please don't delete service roads and driveways.
|
136301015 | over 2 years ago | Once again: please do not delete existing objects only to replace them. Improve existing data.
|
136409399 | over 2 years ago | Please don't delete objects only to replace them. Please improve the existing data.
|
136412352 | over 2 years ago | Please don't delete service roads. Those are immensely useful to others.
|
136336476 | over 2 years ago | When adding a street name, it's important to fully spell out the name instead of abbreviating it. Computers know how to abbreviate, but they can't expand an abbreviation.
|
136335585 | over 2 years ago | It looks like you deleted a rather large chunk of this water body. Did you mean to do that?
|
135559350 | over 2 years ago | Please make sure you're using the most up-to-date imagery. Some of the changes you made don't reflect the latest state. The parking lot at Malcolm Yards, for example, is there and should not have been deleted. Also, when improving geometry of an existing object, please don't delete it and redraw it. This removes any trace of the previous people that have worked on it.
|
134772733 | over 2 years ago | Why did you delete this road? Does it not exist anymore?
|
134553448 | over 2 years ago | I would say that that practice is controversial at best: osm.wiki/Talk:Buses#Bus_Route_Naming The name of the route is "Green Line" and the from/to directionality information is present in the "from" and "to" tags. Including the from/to in the name is redundant and incorrect. |
134553448 | over 2 years ago | I understand the two different directions, but that's not the name of the route. The "name" should be tagged "Green Line" in all three relations. |