indigomc's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
95123053 | over 4 years ago | I'm deleting long random line way 860039388 marked as a road edited in this changeset. |
98113899 | over 4 years ago | Why did you change an 'amenity=school' tag at node 7769020157 to 'amenity=dojo'?
|
85267728 | over 4 years ago | Hi Tharakannur, I'm deleting some bad drawing, including some of your own. Please correct it. There are a number of tools to make correct drawing easier. |
98162454 | over 4 years ago | Hi Tupai0980 Thanks for your offer to help and your contributions. Unfortunately they do not seem to meet OSM requirements and guidelines. Please have a read through the help pages and beginners guide at osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide and ask questions in the various forums if needed.
|
98840442 | over 4 years ago | Hi. If you are experimenting then remember the map becomes live as soon as you save it. Your changes are now visible. If there is reason for them, please provide it in the changeset. Please read guidelines before proceeding, and if need be, you can ask questions in the OSM forums. |
87484194 | over 4 years ago | Hi
|
94080318 | over 4 years ago | Reverted |
94080318 | over 4 years ago | OK, but while I can revert the changeset, that will also remove all the changes you made along with this one. I'll revert the changeset tomorrow unless you let me know, is that ok? |
94080318 | over 4 years ago | Why did you make this kink in the 'Kumarapuram-Murinjapaam Road', and not just that, attach it to other roads nearby? I could just revert it, but presumably you have a reason? Thanks. |
89028596 | almost 5 years ago | What are all these thigns added in this changeset please? It appears to be house numbers, but they are labelled water wells and perennial ones at that. |
92267465 | almost 5 years ago | Hi With regard to your addition in this changeset, and please correct me if I have understood any of this. But there seem to be a number of private names added to the map in this and related changesets, apparently at their houses, despite the inappropriate tag / value leisure=common. This must not happen - see osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information . Please reply promptly and if necessary remove this information. Otherwise I will do it very soon. If there is difficulty identifying all relevant such details, I may have to remove other information that has been added in this changeset. Please also notify any other contributors who have been involved in similar additions. Example
Thanks, from user indigomc. |
90872814 | almost 5 years ago | Hi again. Please be sure that places marked as leisure=playground are those that meet the standard OSM usage of playground, i.e. for small children, with swings, roundabouts et.c. This looks like a pitch or recreation ground. I know Indian English is different, but in the tagging this is probably leisure=pitch. Thanks. |
90876582 | almost 5 years ago | Hi. You've marked the whole college and its grounds as a building. The building=college should only be used on the college buildings. The whole college and its surrounding grounds can be marked with amenity=college. Thanks.. |
85271632 | almost 5 years ago | I assume that adding this arrow marked as a house was a joke. I've therefore deleted it. If not please explain and I'll reinstate it. |
86615443 | almost 5 years ago | way 815802716 is untagged. Is it a river basin? |
84387183 | about 5 years ago | River created over another river. This is confused, deleting the second river, named Aluva. Please discuss before making more changes. |
83522558 | about 5 years ago | One section / carriageway of Hoodi Main Road was changed from primary to residential. I've restored that, please check the rest of the changes in this changeset. |
77696859 | about 5 years ago | This changed the name of the Taj Mahal (principal item) to something incorrect, apparantly two alternative versions one after the other, in Tamil. Take care in future edits please. |
80448658 | over 5 years ago | The disputed Kalapani territory has at least one bad relationship. See note osm.org/note/2096182 and the border marked to its south and west which includes an orphan section of the Indian border. This should be corrected, but there are multiple relations here that I cannot work out. I have broken the border (split the way) at node 2995999958 to try to isolate the fault for now. |
78389624 | over 5 years ago | It's not needed of course, and I've just removed it. The reason such things exist is that they are drawn as relations by the software (scanaerial). Then I assume i had to decide if to delete the spurious stuff, islands et.c. when they are intermittently flooded. Sometimes all the other members are deleted but by mistake the relation remains unnecessarily. Please feel free to remove if you see more. |