jaimemd's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
81600094 | about 5 years ago | Spiega le fonti di questo percorso in modo più dettagliato! Grazie. |
81600094 | about 5 years ago | Ciao. Un messaggio di errore della mappa nega l'esistenza di questo percorso. Poiché manca anche altra documentazione e il tuo contribuzione non contiene ulteriori informazioni (trail_visibility, sac_scale), vorrei eliminare di nuovo questo percorso. |
78270134 | over 5 years ago | Hi, I changed the location of baia del silenzio to what I found on their website. This and La Maree I changed from village to hotel and also tagged the respective areas with leisure=resort. I hope this is ok. |
77440639 | over 5 years ago | Hi mahep, I found you contribution because I had been searching for a possibility to walk from Compora to Gole del Calore for a longer time. Thanks a lot for this. This area doesn't have an active mapper communitiy so probably there will be nobody to critizise mistakes. Did anyone react to your request for review? If you have questions I would be happy to help. |
75180651 | almost 6 years ago | railway track layout, some additional tracks, making it all look a little bit nicer. Sorry for the large area - I missed to save the changes before switching to another railway station. |
71186416 | almost 6 years ago | Vielen Dank! Das ist eine hervorragende Information. |
71186416 | almost 6 years ago | Hallo! Sind diese Wege wirklich existent und durchgehend begehbar? Sind Sie selbst dort gewesen? |
64239679 | almost 6 years ago | In openstreetmap hai aggiunto il percorso "Sentiero della Loggetta". Sarei molto felice se potessi anche dire i parametri "sac_scale" e "trail_visibility" e se la via è pratica per un escursionista a metà esperienza con GPS. Ovviamente, recentemente qualcuno si è perso qui e dopo il grave incidente di Simon Gautier, vorrei fare molta attenzione. |
48113976 | almost 7 years ago | The two parts are supposed to have different attributes in order to distinguish between the main railway line (für signaltechnisch gesicherte Zugfahrten) and the siding or spur tracks leading to kay walls or loading tracks. Für das Ende einer Zugfahrt ist ein Bahnhof im eisenbahnbetriebstechnischen Sinne erforderlich. Deswegen halte ich es für sinnvoll, innerhalb eines Bahnhofs diese Trennung vorzunehmen. Die genaue Wahl der Stelle und ob es sich tatsächlich um "Bahnhöfe" handelt, ist vermutet. Gerne beantworte ich weitere Fragen. |
61559526 | almost 7 years ago | Hi lawrennd, thanks for adding a route from Ciolandrea down to the coast. This ist very interesting to me. Could you add some information about the difficulty? Either in italian classification (T/E/EE …) or sac_scale. Also "trail_visibility" would be interesting. You call it a footway, which means to me it's a constructed way. Is this right? Is there vegetation giving difficulty to making progress? |
46302745 | over 8 years ago | Hi nazgul5, I did'n want to split the town but the residential area. The relation I changed both has landuse=residential and the town's name, not the administrative boundary. But the town is also represented by a node and the administrative boundary as a relation separate from the landuse information. This one I did not touch. Of course it is possible to reconnect the three parts where the impact of the railway area is low (in the western part). Otherwise I would delete the indeed wrong name of the residential areas. What du you prefer? |
45892121 | over 8 years ago | Hi dudka, thanks for your message. Of course I will complete my work. I usually like wait some days until my changes are rendered but sometimes is gets out of my mind and it takes some time until I get back to it. With your help it will be easier to do. Additionally I would give service=* to even more railway tracks especially the lage shunting yard (Kupyansk sort.) |
45566666 | over 8 years ago | Hi,
|
13771609 | over 8 years ago | Hi again an thanks for you reply. Those ones connect to the network used "Lezard Rouge" which has been modernised with 1000 mm according to recent photographs. The other end has been tagged as abandoned and is interrupted by the man-made Lac du Sidi Saad. Hard to believe that this line had been converted from 1000 to 1435 before ... |
13771609 | over 8 years ago | Hi ulrichm,
|
41908542 | almost 9 years ago | OK. It did not look as accurate however I was not sure about thie bing image's position. So of course ti is better this way. Two other things: The tag oneway=* is not to be used with railways according to german forum discussion. I do not delete it however since it makes some kind of sense. The other: suburbs are ususally mapped either as points or with administrative borders as multipolygons. Here the suburb is an area and the mapping of residential areas with landuse=residential is missing. The same I found elsewhere all over Russia. Whe I come about this I like to fit the area to the residential areas and add landuse=residential. Is this ok or should I rather leave it like it is? |
41863449 | almost 9 years ago | If I caused any problem with the data, please tell me the name of the nearest rail station and I will try to fix it. |
41863449 | almost 9 years ago | Обе пути двухпутной линии должны иметь 2. Я думаю, что не нужно отмечать второй путь. Тег не является обязательным.
|
41863449 | almost 9 years ago | Да точно.
|
41385450 | almost 9 years ago | I'd love to do this. The other user was a test account since I had some problem with JOSM. Also it was difficult to edit this area because the Bing images seem to have incorrect position. Now I found that mapbox images seem to do better. Sorry for the mess and thanks for asking! |