1. Better to classify this field as an "airstrip"

    Closed
    #99377738 0 1 0 0

  2. .

    Closed
    #99377611 0 1 0 0

  3. Better to classify this field as an "airstrip"

    Closed
    #99377463 0 1 0 0

  4. Better to classify this field as an "airstrip"

    Closed
    #99377038 0 1 0 0

  5. Made aeroway entries "projected" as explained on the linked webbsite "Aterriza"

    Closed
    #99239411 1 1 0 0

  6. updated runway

    Closed
    #99222977 0 1 0 0

  7. added runway

    Closed
    #99170824 3 1 0 0

  8. standard lifecycle tagging

    Closed
    #98971029 0 1 1 0

  9. corrected tagging for airstrip "under construction"

    Closed
    #98970673 0 1 0 0

  10. removed incorrect "name" tags

    Closed
    #98938995 0 4 0 0

  11. added icao

    Closed
    #98938906 0 1 0 0

  12. .

    Closed
    #98903956 0 1 0 0

  13. More standard tagging

    Closed
    #98903533 0 1 0 0

  14. Added Fram Airstrip clearly visible on sat. images

    Closed
    #98862080 4 0 0 2

  15. maps.aopa.ru also mention a 16/34 of 560m length

    Closed
    #98848222 3 0 0 0

  16. Added airstrip to match pre-existant runway ; as per ourairports.com

    Closed
    #98848134 1 0 0 0

  17. added ubiquitous "name" tag

    Closed
    #98847570 0 1 0 0

  18. .

    Closed
    #98819800 0 2 0 0

  19. more correct naming - this cannot be an "airport" properly speaking

    Closed
    #98815204 0 1 0 0

  20. Added runway to aerodrome

    Closed
    #98702384 3 1 0 0