javbw's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
81614901 | about 3 years ago | disconnected footways. needs repair. |
43658969 | about 3 years ago | great job mapping the farmland! |
81618860 | about 3 years ago | This changeset, like other mapping in the area, is full of disconnected sidewalks and waterways. they should be connected or deleted. if they are not connected properly, they are useless ways merely decorating the tile renders, but not useful as OSM mapping data. I am repairing ways along the levees and a few sidewalks and other major ped footpaths in the area after cycling surveys. the others need repair. refer to Japan GSI layers for proper alignment and Maxar / Bing for new changes. |
116683736 | over 3 years ago | There are very crude polygons here. please use "Q" to sQuare your buildings. |
110588826 | over 3 years ago | yep - the wirefarme shortcut in iD is "w" - and I accidently stick it on things. Thanks for catching this one! |
77771048 | about 4 years ago | the more I look, the more bad mapping I find. Please do not edit any cycleways or pedestrian paths. |
77771048 | about 4 years ago | This entire changeset should be reverted. Do not map cycleways as paths. |
106634403 | about 4 years ago | There must be a tag of some sort, because the road signs make the legal distinction. |
106634403 | about 4 years ago | Here’s some pictures and further description The width is a physical barrier, (usually with huge concrete chokers to keep 5 ton trucks from trying to sneak into somewhere they shouldn’t), but all of the tags I am adding are signed legal restrictions - they are signed with common road signs (and amendment /exception signs below them) present everywhere in Japan. They are standard and mass produced, so I assume they have a common national road law behind their implementation. Regardless, the access restrictions are signed by the city/prefecture, so it is a mappable trait not dependent on width. Width is hard to catch while cycling 😉 Here are some pics of two kinds of these narrow mixed access grade crossings, a “small and special okay” and two other “2-wheel only” crossings present on the Tobu & Jomo lines here in Kiryu on my way home. I just took them for this post: - regular crossing - no restrictions.
There are hundreds of these types of crossing in each prefecture. - no motorcar, bollard/post present, “2 wheels” excepted (scooters): ped/ bicycle/ scooter access. Ped only: rare - only foot and bikes : Often has a cycle barrier to force dismount/caution - and stop scooters - not to actually prevent bicycle access. This is to keep noisy bikes from taking shortcuts around signals/traffic in some places. - ped only - no bicycles either, as the crossing has stairs to access it on one end, and more convenient crossings exist for bikes - pretty dang rare. I have only seen one or two. |
106634403 | about 4 years ago | I made it up on the spot because the signs don't say "kei car" (軽自動車) which is a class of vehicle for tax purposes , they say "small special vehicles exempted." ( 小特除く ). I was planning to use it on other similar crossings. These tiny grade crossings that are not purposefully for pedestrians (they would have a bollard or be ~1M wide) are for local access for tractors and kei trucks to avoid having to go the long way around, yet narrow enough to physically restrict most vehicles wider than a regular sedan (so all white-plate regular cars are legally restricted). Other narrow crossings have chokers in place to stop HGV from taking shortcuts on roads they can't fit on (or are a bother), but are wide enough for regular vehicles, like the two just to the east of this one. I have now changed the access on this port to kei=yes and agricultural=designated. |
92714996 | about 4 years ago | Still finding garbage data. This changeset should be deleted. |
92714996 | about 4 years ago | level crossing points points are disconnected from the railways and all should be deleted. The ones in my area are all duplicates as well, and unnecessary. |
82239785 | about 5 years ago | bad mapping of the cycleway. deleted and redrew. wrong side of the street and missed many crossing roads. |
83235841 | over 5 years ago | No, it was on purpose. It’s a possible tag or a placeholder until I find the right one. I added it because I needed to look up how to tag “小” vehicles. A lot of the train crossings ban:
I used kei= as a Placeholder in this case. If I can’t get a proper access tag, I will propose “kei” as an access tag for Japanese tagging. Javbw |
81903173 | over 5 years ago | thanks for the mistake correction! |
81017725 | over 5 years ago | this changeset includes very badly mapped sidewalks. |
49474072 | over 5 years ago | more badly mapped ghost tracks and roads mis-tagged to be tracks. |
48767667 | over 5 years ago | more random tracks drawn over drains. all the random tracks need to be deleted. |
48776651 | over 5 years ago | there are many nonexistent tracks and other ways mapped that do not exist mapped over drains. I am doing my best to clean up all these garbage ways. |
66694479 | over 5 years ago | bad editing. |